Because I've been writing a lot of them, lately, I felt like writing a post on sex scenes.
So.
Here's an interesting thing. What do you suppose the purpose of a sex scene is, in literature?
Well, unless you are writing erotica, it's there to... develop plot, reveal character, create tension, worldbuild, and entertain. If you are writing erotica, it should do all those things, and be hot, also.
When writing sex scenes, please keep in mind that real people (a) do not have sex the way fictional characters do [which is to say, like people in movies, either Hollywood or porn, or like people in many novels, either literary or genre. And they definitely don't have sex the way people in romance novels do.] and (b) also do not all have sex the same way that the author prefers to.
Interview your friends. Read a couple of textbooks. Hey! Go out and have some sex, and notice how your partners do it. (Please note: the management is not responsible for any damaged relationships or medical fallout from taking this advice, and does recommend following guidelines for safer sex.)
Real people, having sex, do all sorts of things, including fumbling awkwardly, getting on each other's hair, getting interrupted halfway through and having to come back later (whereby the delay can do all sorts of interesting things to one's physiognomy), and, you know, getting into a really good groove and having the time of their lives. Real sex can be lousy, or mediocre, or pretty good, or triggery, or kind of skull-wringing, and it can carry all sorts of associations and backstory. (I tell people that I write sex and fights and conversations all the same way--it's action and reaction, driven by character issues and agendas, all handled in deference to the plot.)
Sex is not effortless. Nor is it necessarily a complete mess every time it happens, unless you're stuck with somebody who can't read signals or carry off teamwork. (Hint: Before you sleep with somebody, get them to help you move a large piece of furniture. This will tell you a great deal about whether you really want to go there or not.)
Also, by the time two people can carry the nookie off as if it were choreographed, it's probably started to get a bit dull. Or they've been watching too many of those movies/reading too many of those books where it's, you know, smooching, oral sex,*** PIV**** (usually in the missionary position.)
People have different sticking points, and different triggers. One guy may freak out totally about oral sex; the next one may draw the line at anybody more than five years older or younger than he is. This character may hate having somebody else's hands in her hair while she's going down; another may live for it. Think about it. Think about what the character's life experience is, who they are, and where their level of squeamishness is.
Also, if you can't write about something without giggling? Get over that. Because the reader will be able to tell you are squicking. (I'm not saying you shouldn't squick; some things are honestly just made of squick. I'm saying if you can't deal with writing about something matter-of-factly, it's not gonna work on the page. Get comfy, or go write about something else.)
Another thing that serves me well: if you have any particular kinks of your own, unless your characters have good reasons to share those kinks, you might want to avoid writing them. There's a couple of reasons for this: (a) if it's really a hardcore kink, you're going to have a hard time making it seem interesting to anybody who doesn't share the selfsame kink--because the kink itself is enough to push your buttons, so setting it up becomes harder, because you're too close to it. and (b) other people's sexual fantasies are mostly opaque and boring. If you don't believe me, so read some naive internet porn or some of Nancy Friday's work on sexual fantasies. Yawntastic. And mostly no sense of narrative.
Of course, if you are writing erotica for yourself, or for a limited market that shares your kink, knock yourself out. Do what makes you happy. If you're writing in service to a larger non-erotic narrative, however, do be aware that not everybody finds the same things sexy you do. If they're into the character's head enough, though, they may find the things the character finds sexy, sexy, at least for the duration of the scene.
As regular readers know, I'm a big proponent of practical experience and experimentation in all things artistic. If you are writing kinks that are not your own, you might want to either try it out, or ask around a little. (We recommend exercising common sense. Autoerotic asphyxiation*, pedophilia, bestiality, and self-mutilation are probably best not experimented with.**)
The thing with writing good sex scenes, as the thing with writing everything else, is this: telling detail, man. Not a chair: this chair. Not a cat: this cat. Not a sex scene, idealized or farcical, but this sex scene, right here, right now, with these two****** characters having this sex.
When you get the off-beat, perfect detail just right, and it makes the scene concrete and real, that's called fabulous reality.
If you have that, you can do no wrong.
*Although I hear you can fake it with corsetry, but please don't engage in any potentially life-threatening behaviors just to find out if breath restriction really does give you better orgasms. That one falls under the ask-a-friend catalogue.
**Me, I've got this one guy with a serious hardcore pain kink. Now, I've got the pain tolerance of an ox, but I don't even get an endorphin rush from a piercing. This is where I resort to expert help, because my physiology does not cooperate.)
***Even mainstream Hollywood has discovered cunnilingus in the last ten years. I think it's still a bit edgy, though. Shocking!
****penis-in-vagina, a handy TLA***** for when you need to talk about that societally approved form of sex that even former President Clinton presumably considers, you know, sex.
*****Three-letter-acronym
******or one, or three, or seventy
Mmm. Kool-aid. Yes, another author drinking it. (via
anghara)
Is there something about too many NYT best-sellers that causes spongiform encephalopathy?
So.
Here's an interesting thing. What do you suppose the purpose of a sex scene is, in literature?
Well, unless you are writing erotica, it's there to... develop plot, reveal character, create tension, worldbuild, and entertain. If you are writing erotica, it should do all those things, and be hot, also.
When writing sex scenes, please keep in mind that real people (a) do not have sex the way fictional characters do [which is to say, like people in movies, either Hollywood or porn, or like people in many novels, either literary or genre. And they definitely don't have sex the way people in romance novels do.] and (b) also do not all have sex the same way that the author prefers to.
Interview your friends. Read a couple of textbooks. Hey! Go out and have some sex, and notice how your partners do it. (Please note: the management is not responsible for any damaged relationships or medical fallout from taking this advice, and does recommend following guidelines for safer sex.)
Real people, having sex, do all sorts of things, including fumbling awkwardly, getting on each other's hair, getting interrupted halfway through and having to come back later (whereby the delay can do all sorts of interesting things to one's physiognomy), and, you know, getting into a really good groove and having the time of their lives. Real sex can be lousy, or mediocre, or pretty good, or triggery, or kind of skull-wringing, and it can carry all sorts of associations and backstory. (I tell people that I write sex and fights and conversations all the same way--it's action and reaction, driven by character issues and agendas, all handled in deference to the plot.)
Sex is not effortless. Nor is it necessarily a complete mess every time it happens, unless you're stuck with somebody who can't read signals or carry off teamwork. (Hint: Before you sleep with somebody, get them to help you move a large piece of furniture. This will tell you a great deal about whether you really want to go there or not.)
Also, by the time two people can carry the nookie off as if it were choreographed, it's probably started to get a bit dull. Or they've been watching too many of those movies/reading too many of those books where it's, you know, smooching, oral sex,*** PIV**** (usually in the missionary position.)
People have different sticking points, and different triggers. One guy may freak out totally about oral sex; the next one may draw the line at anybody more than five years older or younger than he is. This character may hate having somebody else's hands in her hair while she's going down; another may live for it. Think about it. Think about what the character's life experience is, who they are, and where their level of squeamishness is.
Also, if you can't write about something without giggling? Get over that. Because the reader will be able to tell you are squicking. (I'm not saying you shouldn't squick; some things are honestly just made of squick. I'm saying if you can't deal with writing about something matter-of-factly, it's not gonna work on the page. Get comfy, or go write about something else.)
Another thing that serves me well: if you have any particular kinks of your own, unless your characters have good reasons to share those kinks, you might want to avoid writing them. There's a couple of reasons for this: (a) if it's really a hardcore kink, you're going to have a hard time making it seem interesting to anybody who doesn't share the selfsame kink--because the kink itself is enough to push your buttons, so setting it up becomes harder, because you're too close to it. and (b) other people's sexual fantasies are mostly opaque and boring. If you don't believe me, so read some naive internet porn or some of Nancy Friday's work on sexual fantasies. Yawntastic. And mostly no sense of narrative.
Of course, if you are writing erotica for yourself, or for a limited market that shares your kink, knock yourself out. Do what makes you happy. If you're writing in service to a larger non-erotic narrative, however, do be aware that not everybody finds the same things sexy you do. If they're into the character's head enough, though, they may find the things the character finds sexy, sexy, at least for the duration of the scene.
As regular readers know, I'm a big proponent of practical experience and experimentation in all things artistic. If you are writing kinks that are not your own, you might want to either try it out, or ask around a little. (We recommend exercising common sense. Autoerotic asphyxiation*, pedophilia, bestiality, and self-mutilation are probably best not experimented with.**)
The thing with writing good sex scenes, as the thing with writing everything else, is this: telling detail, man. Not a chair: this chair. Not a cat: this cat. Not a sex scene, idealized or farcical, but this sex scene, right here, right now, with these two****** characters having this sex.
When you get the off-beat, perfect detail just right, and it makes the scene concrete and real, that's called fabulous reality.
If you have that, you can do no wrong.
*Although I hear you can fake it with corsetry, but please don't engage in any potentially life-threatening behaviors just to find out if breath restriction really does give you better orgasms. That one falls under the ask-a-friend catalogue.
**Me, I've got this one guy with a serious hardcore pain kink. Now, I've got the pain tolerance of an ox, but I don't even get an endorphin rush from a piercing. This is where I resort to expert help, because my physiology does not cooperate.)
***Even mainstream Hollywood has discovered cunnilingus in the last ten years. I think it's still a bit edgy, though. Shocking!
****penis-in-vagina, a handy TLA***** for when you need to talk about that societally approved form of sex that even former President Clinton presumably considers, you know, sex.
*****Three-letter-acronym
******or one, or three, or seventy
Mmm. Kool-aid. Yes, another author drinking it. (via
Is there something about too many NYT best-sellers that causes spongiform encephalopathy?

Comments
Like other people's D&D games! It's only fascinating when it's yours!
I agree with you, is what I'm saying. But I think that a lot of writers have truly listened when someone wise says that the point of a sex scene is to develop plot, reveal character, create tension, worldbuild, and entertain, but what they've actually *heard* is that it's to develop plot, reveal character, etc., too. As in, "Don't just have hot sex for the sake of hot sex. Make sure a little real story happens in there, too." And as far as I'm concerned, from the lone freak corner, that ain't good enough.
It's sort of like I'm reading in black and white something which the writer imagined being read in color. If the cinematography is good enough - not to mention the acting, directing, screen-writing, music, timing and delivery, and all the rest - then I'm not going to feel that I am missing something. Otherwise, I'm liable to consider wandering out for a coffee and maybe checking back in later to see if the story has stopped being people having sex and has gone back to people being interesting yet. But there's always the chance that I won't check back in later, too.
I wish every writer not intending to write erotica would consider, not just 'does this scene serve my story?' but 'if the reader finds nothing remotely appealing about the sex, will this scene still be worth reading?'
To which I say, well, you know, I'm sorry you have this issue, but that's as nonsensical as telling me to leave out all the scenes in which characters argue, or lie, or eat, or dance--
It's not any different. It's something people do, and therefor it's something characters do, and is best handled using the same guidelines. Or at least, that's what makes sense for me.
Long time ago I wrote something sexually explicit just to see if I could. Apparently I can...
I think we're back to the furniture-moving analogy....
Amen.
This is a really fantastic post, and I'm so glad you made it (I was recced here by a friend). Thank you, so much.
I'm glad you made this post, it's definitely going in my "writing" bookmarks.
(I just cut a million-page sex scene out of Ink & Steel for length reasons, even though it was doing useful work. And I have to go rewrite another one in Hell & Earth, because it's going all wrong and it's, er... climactic. :-P And I'm looking at Patience & Fortitude and realizing it's going to be smutty, because in part it's about sex magic.
Tangent: Someone who made most of his living writing porn novels told me about turning in a novel -- and finding out that the editor had forgotten to mention that this was supposed to be a gay rather than straight porn novel. Writer went back, changed gender and sex of about half the characters and other necessary changes, handed it back in.
Rereading it after publication, he realized he'd forgotten to change an anatomical detail in one scene.
My distinction between porn and erotica: If poor prose style is likely to get in the way, it's porn. If elegant prose style is likely to get in the way, it's erotica.
Hee!
Though that probably would have been the one thing that DID work for me, in such a story. Card symbolism is more fun than many a sex scene I have read.
YES! One way to fix it is to put the "emotional" narrative in that good writing would probably tell you to leave out. Saying what they feel, putting in those little buzzwords of porniness, etc. that are not immediate concrete experience. Because the ICE there isn't gonna work, like you say. An example (though you may not wanna go there) is the last bit of Delany's *The Mad Man* where, for the first time, he lays out the *feelings* the guy is having, *states* the eroticism of it for him, whereas all through the rest of the book he just described what happened. Damnedest thing.
Was the paragraph right after that supposed to end there with the word "however"? It looks like maybe something got accidentally cut.
But yeah. Totally. This is a lot of why I don't find most sex scenes erotic, cuz I'm just not that vanilla-oriented so all those little nudity buttons and whatnot don't work for me.
And yes oh yes about the purpose of a sex scene. Such a waste when everything stops and they have sex and then the story gets going again.
Me, I find that boooring. I live for the guessing game. (Our Mutual Fandom, probably a clue that This Is So, no?)
Accidentally cut = accidentally not written. I sort of compose in very nonlinear order, and I jumped somewhere else and never went back and finished the thought. Fixed now, and thank you!
God knows what I'm going to do with it once I'm finished, of course, but hey...
So there you go.
This may be the best piece of advice I've ever seen. Someone needs to put it on a sampler.
But really, it would be the same for any massive cooperative effort where somebody might get hurt.
And this?
(Hint: Before you sleep with somebody, get them to help you move a large piece of furniture. This will tell you a great deal about whether you really want to go there or not.)
Should be part of the handbook.
The handbook somebody on my flist linked to Thoreau talking about, recently?
I tell people that I write sex and fights and conversations all the same way--it's action and reaction, driven by character issues and agendas, all handled in deference to the plot.
A lot of people I know (myself included), tend to skip sex scenes - and I think that's exactly why: there's no real story-related reason why the sex scene should be there. So we skip ahead to where the actual story continues.
Some people apparently find this makes my books very confusing.
(Hey, any moment of intensity is a place to put some exploration of character under stress.)
I'm really glad you wrote this. The moving furniture analogy is perfect. WIsh I'd done it with some previous lovers. I mean, you know, the thing where it's not furniture that you're moving but... anyway...
I used to write torrid sex scenes and then realized one day they made me horribly squeamish. Thus I stopped. Haven't written one since.
I'm writing something now where it's a husband and wife who are so far from the possibility of having sex that I can't even imagine it. Not just because the wife is bound physically to a couch for the entirety of the story.
Don't ask. It'll make sense once you read it. And it's not what you think.
I will admit, I like *funny* sex scenes, or sad ones, or ones with some emotional range in them. They make me happy.
I remember reading a blog entry that was absolutely brilliant about how to write sex scenes with a fair bit of detail and examples from various genres, though I can't remember where it was now...I think
And it's awkward, and funny, and real. Just beautifully done.
(The Cooler is also my example movie for understated urban fantasy. THAT is how magic works in the Promethean Age universe, 99 44/100 percent of the time.)
When I was doing a lot of editing in the erotica genre I used to tell writers struggling with the relationship between plot and action to go watch half a dozen good Hong Kong movies. Michelle Yeoh, Chow Yun Fat, Jackie Chan, Jet Li. Anything by John Woo. Etc.
Then I would tell them this: "Sex in erotica should be like fight scenes in good Hong Kong movies: a showcase for virtuosity, and entertaining, but also it has to have a reason to happen and it has to do something in the larger storyline, or it's not a story, just an exhibition."
I've also been known to use the "eat, fight, or fuck" test for sex scenes in fiction. Those three are the three most primal things that small groups of people do together, in most cultures -- so if the sex scene can't be replaced by a scene of the same two people doing one of those other two things, it's gratuitous and probably ought to hit the bit bucket.
I'm working on one right now where person A and person B are eating, fighting, and fucking.
More or less in parallel.
Do I get some kind of virtuoso award if I pull it off?
(Okay, what's going on is that the eating keeps getting interrupted by the arguing, and the arguing gets interrupted by the eating, eventually both will be interrupted by the sex. Because she really doesn't want pizza smeared in her hair THAT badly.)
(As it turns out, there probably won't be a lot of "sex" in this book, given the female protag's issues...which took me about 20,000 words of just character development writing to really figure out. When it does happen, though, it should be stellar).
Oh, and I do that thing, too, where I write in a non-linear fashion, and sometimes forget to go back and finish a thought!
If you ever have the inclination, I'd love to hear your thoughts on collaborative writing (since you've been doing a lot of that recently).
OR is it that a lesbian supports so many heinous Republican candidates? I guess since she's bipolar, it's understandable. More sad than anything, though.
Well, unless you are writing erotica, it's there to... develop plot, reveal character, create tension, worldbuild, and entertain. If you are writing erotica, it should do all those things, and be hot, also.
Wow. Just had this discussion two nights ago with a friends who professionally edits erotica.
If it doesn't serve to do the above mentioned things--- it's just porn...and most of it (from what I've had to suffer through) is just badly written porn.
I give this post two velvety purple headed warriors of love. (yeah, I've seen that line too :( )
Reading your journal and repeatedly reading you talk about how scenes are there to develop plot, reveal character, create tension, worldbuild, and entertain put my gut feelings into useful words and understand what I was doing with those scenes I felt needed to be there, and why.
Reading this again now makes me feel better about going back and fixing an almost-sex scene in the work I'm writing that's been bugging me since I wrote it because it's long and unwieldy and doesn't quite make the mark. Your post made me go, "Oh yeah. I need to figure out what this scene is supposed to be doing and make it do that."
So thanks, again, for sharing what you've learned, because it helps me understand what I'm flailing at and why I'm flailing at it.
After I read this, I tried to think of novels I had read that had really good sex scenes, that were there for a purpose and not just because the writer thought that there "ought" to be some sex now. There aren't many. They tend to be either sex by numbers or overcome with purple prose. If someone is going to write about sex, they need to at least call a clitoris a clitoris. There's just no need for throbbing manhoods and quivering love buttons.
And I disagree. If the POV character would say "manhood," then the narrative should say "manhood."
Vocabulary choice is characterization.
Boringly written sex even has its place, if it's between boring characters.
Out of character sex would be my sole squick. If Kool-aid gets you where you want to go, by all means Drink!
Art is the interesting-parts version of life.
Also, it sounds to me like you might be writing erotica, in which case, isn't the sex the point?
Not necessarily ;)
OK, the deserved serious response: to me sex is basically a form of communication, and if the other forms of communication between two people aren't dull, then....
I love this! Here's my husband's version of it, developed this summer as we assembled a gas grill together: "Who needs couples therapy? If we want to know if our marriage is solid, all we need to do is assemble something complicated together."