Previous Entry | Next Entry

can't sleep books will eat me
Because I've been writing a lot of them, lately, I felt like writing a post on sex scenes.

So.



Here's an interesting thing. What do you suppose the purpose of a sex scene is, in literature?

Well, unless you are writing erotica, it's there to... develop plot, reveal character, create tension, worldbuild, and entertain. If you are writing erotica, it should do all those things, and be hot, also.

When writing sex scenes, please keep in mind that real people (a) do not have sex the way fictional characters do [which is to say, like people in movies, either Hollywood or porn, or like people in many novels, either literary or genre. And they definitely don't have sex the way people in romance novels do.] and (b) also do not all have sex the same way that the author prefers to.

Interview your friends. Read a couple of textbooks. Hey! Go out and have some sex, and notice how your partners do it. (Please note: the management is not responsible for any damaged relationships or medical fallout from taking this advice, and does recommend following guidelines for safer sex.)

Real people, having sex, do all sorts of things, including fumbling awkwardly, getting on each other's hair, getting interrupted halfway through and having to come back later (whereby the delay can do all sorts of interesting things to one's physiognomy), and, you know, getting into a really good groove and having the time of their lives. Real sex can be lousy, or mediocre, or pretty good, or triggery, or kind of skull-wringing, and it can carry all sorts of associations and backstory. (I tell people that I write sex and fights and conversations all the same way--it's action and reaction, driven by character issues and agendas, all handled in deference to the plot.)

Sex is not effortless. Nor is it necessarily a complete mess every time it happens, unless you're stuck with somebody who can't read signals or carry off teamwork. (Hint: Before you sleep with somebody, get them to help you move a large piece of furniture. This will tell you a great deal about whether you really want to go there or not.)

Also, by the time two people can carry the nookie off as if it were choreographed, it's probably started to get a bit dull. Or they've been watching too many of those movies/reading too many of those books where it's, you know, smooching, oral sex,*** PIV**** (usually in the missionary position.)

People have different sticking points, and different triggers. One guy may freak out totally about oral sex; the next one may draw the line at anybody more than five years older or younger than he is. This character may hate having somebody else's hands in her hair while she's going down; another may live for it. Think about it. Think about what the character's life experience is, who they are, and where their level of squeamishness is.

Also, if you can't write about something without giggling? Get over that. Because the reader will be able to tell you are squicking. (I'm not saying you shouldn't squick; some things are honestly just made of squick. I'm saying if you can't deal with writing about something matter-of-factly, it's not gonna work on the page. Get comfy, or go write about something else.)

Another thing that serves me well: if you have any particular kinks of your own, unless your characters have good reasons to share those kinks, you might want to avoid writing them. There's a couple of reasons for this: (a) if it's really a hardcore kink, you're going to have a hard time making it seem interesting to anybody who doesn't share the selfsame kink--because the kink itself is enough to push your buttons, so setting it up becomes harder, because you're too close to it. and (b) other people's sexual fantasies are mostly opaque and boring. If you don't believe me, so read some naive internet porn or some of Nancy Friday's work on sexual fantasies. Yawntastic. And mostly no sense of narrative.

Of course, if you are writing erotica for yourself, or for a limited market that shares your kink, knock yourself out. Do what makes you happy. If you're writing in service to a larger non-erotic narrative, however, do be aware that not everybody finds the same things sexy you do. If they're into the character's head enough, though, they may find the things the character finds sexy, sexy, at least for the duration of the scene.

As regular readers know, I'm a big proponent of practical experience and experimentation in all things artistic. If you are writing kinks that are not your own, you might want to either try it out, or ask around a little. (We recommend exercising common sense. Autoerotic asphyxiation*, pedophilia, bestiality, and self-mutilation are probably best not experimented with.**)

The thing with writing good sex scenes, as the thing with writing everything else, is this: telling detail, man. Not a chair: this chair. Not a cat: this cat. Not a sex scene, idealized or farcical, but this sex scene, right here, right now, with these two****** characters having this sex.

When you get the off-beat, perfect detail just right, and it makes the scene concrete and real, that's called fabulous reality.

If you have that, you can do no wrong.



*Although I hear you can fake it with corsetry, but please don't engage in any potentially life-threatening behaviors just to find out if breath restriction really does give you better orgasms. That one falls under the ask-a-friend catalogue.

**Me, I've got this one guy with a serious hardcore pain kink. Now, I've got the pain tolerance of an ox, but I don't even get an endorphin rush from a piercing. This is where I resort to expert help, because my physiology does not cooperate.)

***Even mainstream Hollywood has discovered cunnilingus in the last ten years. I think it's still a bit edgy, though. Shocking!

****penis-in-vagina, a handy TLA***** for when you need to talk about that societally approved form of sex that even former President Clinton presumably considers, you know, sex.

*****Three-letter-acronym

******or one, or three, or seventy





Mmm. Kool-aid. Yes, another author drinking it. (via [info]anghara)

Is there something about too many NYT best-sellers that causes spongiform encephalopathy?

Comments

Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
[info]cristalia wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 05:21 am (UTC)
(b) other people's sexual fantasies are mostly opaque and boring.

Like other people's D&D games! It's only fascinating when it's yours!
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 05:22 am (UTC)
a-fucking-men
(no subject) - [info]mmerriam - Nov. 24th, 2007 05:28 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 24th, 2007 05:30 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]cristalia - Nov. 24th, 2007 05:40 am (UTC) Expand
[info]callunav wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 05:37 am (UTC)
I wonder how many readers are like me. I always feel like a lone freak, but I suspect I'm not: sex scenes in stories almost never turn me on. Not even a little bit. Not in The Sharing Knife, not in Kushiel's Dart, not in...well, yeah. Etc.. And that means that I get really annoyed by a lot of sex scenes, not because I think sex isn't important to a lot of people at least some of the time, but because I don't have any reason to read it except for the same reasons I have for reading any other scene in the book. A lot of the time, I already know that a lot of plot-related things will not be furthered while the characters take time out to cavort upon the divan, so I'm that much more dubious going in.

I agree with you, is what I'm saying. But I think that a lot of writers have truly listened when someone wise says that the point of a sex scene is to develop plot, reveal character, create tension, worldbuild, and entertain, but what they've actually *heard* is that it's to develop plot, reveal character, etc., too. As in, "Don't just have hot sex for the sake of hot sex. Make sure a little real story happens in there, too." And as far as I'm concerned, from the lone freak corner, that ain't good enough.

It's sort of like I'm reading in black and white something which the writer imagined being read in color. If the cinematography is good enough - not to mention the acting, directing, screen-writing, music, timing and delivery, and all the rest - then I'm not going to feel that I am missing something. Otherwise, I'm liable to consider wandering out for a coffee and maybe checking back in later to see if the story has stopped being people having sex and has gone back to people being interesting yet. But there's always the chance that I won't check back in later, too.

I wish every writer not intending to write erotica would consider, not just 'does this scene serve my story?' but 'if the reader finds nothing remotely appealing about the sex, will this scene still be worth reading?'
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 05:44 am (UTC)
I *have* gotten email from people who tell me they just skip the sex scenes, and they wish I would leave them out.

To which I say, well, you know, I'm sorry you have this issue, but that's as nonsensical as telling me to leave out all the scenes in which characters argue, or lie, or eat, or dance--

It's not any different. It's something people do, and therefor it's something characters do, and is best handled using the same guidelines. Or at least, that's what makes sense for me.
(no subject) - [info]callunav - Nov. 24th, 2007 05:57 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 24th, 2007 05:59 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]callunav - Nov. 24th, 2007 06:11 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 24th, 2007 12:52 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]callunav - Nov. 24th, 2007 04:02 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]gamehawk - Nov. 24th, 2007 02:20 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 24th, 2007 07:00 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]gamehawk - Nov. 24th, 2007 10:50 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 25th, 2007 03:02 am (UTC) Expand
[info]serizawa3000 wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 05:38 am (UTC)
I'm always thinking of how Neil Gaiman tells about how he wrote "Tastings" because it seemed to him that "people never talked while making love or even while having sex." And that it took him four years to write the story, because he'd write a bit, then stop because he felt embarrassed...

Long time ago I wrote something sexually explicit just to see if I could. Apparently I can...
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 05:40 am (UTC)
If you don't talk, how do you get all the limbs in the right places? Like, there's at least one arm too many in any clinch.

I think we're back to the furniture-moving analogy....
(no subject) - [info]kalmn - Nov. 24th, 2007 05:47 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 24th, 2007 05:49 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]mrissa - Nov. 24th, 2007 01:11 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 24th, 2007 01:28 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]dichroic - Nov. 24th, 2007 02:30 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]arielstarshadow - Nov. 24th, 2007 02:11 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]bevhale - Nov. 24th, 2007 02:24 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]edwardina - Nov. 25th, 2007 11:11 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]bevhale - Nov. 26th, 2007 12:46 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]time_testudinem - Nov. 26th, 2007 07:22 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]bevhale - Nov. 26th, 2007 09:53 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]jnik - Nov. 24th, 2007 05:10 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 24th, 2007 06:57 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]feyandstrange - Nov. 25th, 2007 04:16 am (UTC) Expand
[info]fandom_me wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 05:49 am (UTC)
(I tell people that I write sex and fights and conversations all the same way--it's action and reaction, driven by character issues and agendas, all handled in deference to the plot.)

Amen.

This is a really fantastic post, and I'm so glad you made it (I was recced here by a friend). Thank you, so much.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 05:52 am (UTC)
Hi! Nice to meet you, and thanks!
[info]wtfbrain wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 07:23 am (UTC)
I was just talking about this a few days back, wondering about, once you've established that a sex scene (by any definition) is necessary, how explicit do you make it? And I realized that it depends on what genre you're writing, and exactly how much frosting you want on the cake of character/plot development/worldbuilding/whatever you're hoping to accomplish.

I'm glad you made this post, it's definitely going in my "writing" bookmarks.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 01:09 pm (UTC)
Well, yes and no. Because sometimes the sex itself, the way characters have it, is incredibly revealing. It can demonstrate a relationship, or--and this is one I love--people are often, in bed, when their defenses are down--full of surprises. (Butch in the streets, the expression goes, femme in the sheets. Which is you, an oversimplification, but also yo, a valid observation.)

(I just cut a million-page sex scene out of Ink & Steel for length reasons, even though it was doing useful work. And I have to go rewrite another one in Hell & Earth, because it's going all wrong and it's, er... climactic. :-P And I'm looking at Patience & Fortitude and realizing it's going to be smutty, because in part it's about sex magic.
(no subject) - [info]varianor - Nov. 24th, 2007 03:15 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 24th, 2007 06:59 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]varianor - Nov. 25th, 2007 02:21 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 25th, 2007 02:35 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]varianor - Nov. 25th, 2007 02:54 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wtfbrain - Nov. 25th, 2007 03:06 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 25th, 2007 03:08 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wtfbrain - Nov. 25th, 2007 03:15 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 25th, 2007 03:19 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]wtfbrain - Nov. 25th, 2007 03:20 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 25th, 2007 03:24 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]dsgood wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 07:47 am (UTC)
Writing in your own kinks: I recall an amateur strip-poker-leading-to-orgy story which concentrated on the fine points of the poker game. It did not work for me.

Tangent: Someone who made most of his living writing porn novels told me about turning in a novel -- and finding out that the editor had forgotten to mention that this was supposed to be a gay rather than straight porn novel. Writer went back, changed gender and sex of about half the characters and other necessary changes, handed it back in.

Rereading it after publication, he realized he'd forgotten to change an anatomical detail in one scene.

My distinction between porn and erotica: If poor prose style is likely to get in the way, it's porn. If elegant prose style is likely to get in the way, it's erotica.
[info]decarnin wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 09:01 am (UTC)
concentrated on the fine points of the poker game. It did not work for me.

Hee!

Though that probably would have been the one thing that DID work for me, in such a story. Card symbolism is more fun than many a sex scene I have read.
[info]decarnin wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 08:40 am (UTC)
because the kink itself is enough to push your buttons, so setting it up becomes harder, because you're too close to it. and (b) other people's sexual fantasies are mostly opaque and boring.

YES! One way to fix it is to put the "emotional" narrative in that good writing would probably tell you to leave out. Saying what they feel, putting in those little buzzwords of porniness, etc. that are not immediate concrete experience. Because the ICE there isn't gonna work, like you say. An example (though you may not wanna go there) is the last bit of Delany's *The Mad Man* where, for the first time, he lays out the *feelings* the guy is having, *states* the eroticism of it for him, whereas all through the rest of the book he just described what happened. Damnedest thing.

Was the paragraph right after that supposed to end there with the word "however"? It looks like maybe something got accidentally cut.

But yeah. Totally. This is a lot of why I don't find most sex scenes erotic, cuz I'm just not that vanilla-oriented so all those little nudity buttons and whatnot don't work for me.

And yes oh yes about the purpose of a sex scene. Such a waste when everything stops and they have sex and then the story gets going again.

[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 01:16 pm (UTC)
It's an interesting thing about genre writing in general, actually, that "good" genre writing actually includes a good deal more of that emotional narrative than good literary writing. The reader expects more support for her conclusions about what characters feel, and expects motives to be explicit.

Me, I find that boooring. I live for the guessing game. (Our Mutual Fandom, probably a clue that This Is So, no?)

Accidentally cut = accidentally not written. I sort of compose in very nonlinear order, and I jumped somewhere else and never went back and finished the thought. Fixed now, and thank you!
[info]saxonb wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 09:29 am (UTC)
Fantastic post, thanks. I'm currently writing a novella that is, to be honest, pretty damn filthy with a large number of sex scenes (It's a dark, vaguely new weird fantasy that, admittedly, is about revenge and sexual obsession). I've been writing it slowly, and trying to convince myself that it is actually working, and one of the main things I am trying to do is make sure that each bit of sex actually has a reason for being there, whether it's story or character related. After reading this, I now feel there's a small chance it might work out roughly the way I want it to.

God knows what I'm going to do with it once I'm finished, of course, but hey...
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 01:17 pm (UTC)
Hee. There's one novel of mine, where I wrote all the sex scenes first, and then connected them. Because I knew one character's arc was demonstrated though the smut.

So there you go.
(no subject) - [info]plexq - Nov. 24th, 2007 08:59 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]hominysnark wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 11:47 am (UTC)
Hint: Before you sleep with somebody, get them to help you move a large piece of furniture. This will tell you a great deal about whether you really want to go there or not.

This may be the best piece of advice I've ever seen. Someone needs to put it on a sampler.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 01:18 pm (UTC)
I need to learn to TAKE it. *g*

But really, it would be the same for any massive cooperative effort where somebody might get hurt.
(no subject) - [info]comrade_cat - Nov. 24th, 2007 06:22 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]stillnotbored wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 12:17 pm (UTC)
Wow. I hope Patricia at least got the grape flavored kool-aid. Oy.

And this?

(Hint: Before you sleep with somebody, get them to help you move a large piece of furniture. This will tell you a great deal about whether you really want to go there or not.)

Should be part of the handbook.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 01:19 pm (UTC)
Mmm. Grape.

The handbook somebody on my flist linked to Thoreau talking about, recently?
[info]trobadora wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 12:46 pm (UTC)
I'm here via a friend's rec, and I wanted to say thank you for this post, especially this:

I tell people that I write sex and fights and conversations all the same way--it's action and reaction, driven by character issues and agendas, all handled in deference to the plot.

A lot of people I know (myself included), tend to skip sex scenes - and I think that's exactly why: there's no real story-related reason why the sex scene should be there. So we skip ahead to where the actual story continues.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 01:20 pm (UTC)
Hee. I ave this bad habit of putting cruxes of character development in my sex scenes.

Some people apparently find this makes my books very confusing.

(Hey, any moment of intensity is a place to put some exploration of character under stress.)
(no subject) - [info]feyandstrange - Nov. 25th, 2007 04:20 am (UTC) Expand
[info]chang3002 wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 12:48 pm (UTC)
Brava!

I'm really glad you wrote this. The moving furniture analogy is perfect. WIsh I'd done it with some previous lovers. I mean, you know, the thing where it's not furniture that you're moving but... anyway...

I used to write torrid sex scenes and then realized one day they made me horribly squeamish. Thus I stopped. Haven't written one since.

I'm writing something now where it's a husband and wife who are so far from the possibility of having sex that I can't even imagine it. Not just because the wife is bound physically to a couch for the entirety of the story.

Don't ask. It'll make sense once you read it. And it's not what you think.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 01:22 pm (UTC)
Torrid and overwrought is hard to pull off. It merges so quickly into self-parody.

I will admit, I like *funny* sex scenes, or sad ones, or ones with some emotional range in them. They make me happy.
(no subject) - [info]chang3002 - Nov. 24th, 2007 02:46 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]lareinenoire wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 12:54 pm (UTC)
Thanks so much for posting this -- I got it into my head years ago that I couldn't write sex scenes and have since attempted with varying degrees of success. Admittedly I tend to fade to black after a certain point since what I'm usually interested in is the dialogue during the sex and after a point that tends to stop or cease to be important in any plot-driving way (at least in my experience).

I remember reading a blog entry that was absolutely brilliant about how to write sex scenes with a fair bit of detail and examples from various genres, though I can't remember where it was now...I think [info]rosamund has it bookmarked.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 01:24 pm (UTC)
Hee. Check out a movie called The Cooler, with William H. Macy. It's got one of the best sex scenes as narrative I have ever seen. Not only do you learn everything about both characters in about five minutes, but you wind up understanding why they have just fallen catastrophically in love with each other.

And it's awkward, and funny, and real. Just beautifully done.

(The Cooler is also my example movie for understated urban fantasy. THAT is how magic works in the Promethean Age universe, 99 44/100 percent of the time.)
[info]panjianlien wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 01:09 pm (UTC)
Amen.

When I was doing a lot of editing in the erotica genre I used to tell writers struggling with the relationship between plot and action to go watch half a dozen good Hong Kong movies. Michelle Yeoh, Chow Yun Fat, Jackie Chan, Jet Li. Anything by John Woo. Etc.

Then I would tell them this: "Sex in erotica should be like fight scenes in good Hong Kong movies: a showcase for virtuosity, and entertaining, but also it has to have a reason to happen and it has to do something in the larger storyline, or it's not a story, just an exhibition."

I've also been known to use the "eat, fight, or fuck" test for sex scenes in fiction. Those three are the three most primal things that small groups of people do together, in most cultures -- so if the sex scene can't be replaced by a scene of the same two people doing one of those other two things, it's gratuitous and probably ought to hit the bit bucket.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 01:31 pm (UTC)
Hee. *bows to the hexpert*

I'm working on one right now where person A and person B are eating, fighting, and fucking.

More or less in parallel.

Do I get some kind of virtuoso award if I pull it off?

(Okay, what's going on is that the eating keeps getting interrupted by the arguing, and the arguing gets interrupted by the eating, eventually both will be interrupted by the sex. Because she really doesn't want pizza smeared in her hair THAT badly.)
(no subject) - [info]panjianlien - Nov. 24th, 2007 01:43 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 24th, 2007 06:43 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]gamehawk wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 02:33 pm (UTC)
Mary Sue
Re kool-aid: Oh, now it should get interesting. Hi, Patri... er, Sarah.

[info]arielstarshadow wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 02:34 pm (UTC)
As others have already said - thank you for writing this. I'm currently in the process of trying to write a romance (wait, let me qualify that - I'm currently in the process of trying to write a good romance), and while I've got no problems writing the nuts and bolts of sex scenes, I wanted to make sure I wasn't tossing sex in like one tosses spaghetti against a wall to see if it sticks.

(As it turns out, there probably won't be a lot of "sex" in this book, given the female protag's issues...which took me about 20,000 words of just character development writing to really figure out. When it does happen, though, it should be stellar).

Oh, and I do that thing, too, where I write in a non-linear fashion, and sometimes forget to go back and finish a thought!

If you ever have the inclination, I'd love to hear your thoughts on collaborative writing (since you've been doing a lot of that recently).
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 06:56 pm (UTC)
Heh. I have no thoughts on collaborative writing, except get the person you mean to collaborate with to help you move a heavy piece of furniture first.
[info]chang3002 wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 02:49 pm (UTC)
Oh, and on the Patricia Cornwell thing...
Yikes! I'm not sure what I find scary. The paranoia about a gov't wide conspiracy against her crap books.

OR is it that a lesbian supports so many heinous Republican candidates? I guess since she's bipolar, it's understandable. More sad than anything, though.
[info]neutronjockey wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 03:01 pm (UTC)
Here's an interesting thing. What do you suppose the purpose of a sex scene is, in literature?

Well, unless you are writing erotica, it's there to... develop plot, reveal character, create tension, worldbuild, and entertain. If you are writing erotica, it should do all those things, and be hot, also.


Wow. Just had this discussion two nights ago with a friends who professionally edits erotica.
If it doesn't serve to do the above mentioned things--- it's just porn...and most of it (from what I've had to suffer through) is just badly written porn.

I give this post two velvety purple headed warriors of love. (yeah, I've seen that line too :( )
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 07:04 pm (UTC)
just don't ever compare a penis to an organic firehose.
[info]furfina wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 03:34 pm (UTC)
" And they definitely don't have sex the way people in romance novels do."
I remember one time you and I were talking about sex scenes in romance novels and how the authors frequently refer to the penis as the "manhood," and we came up with the following line for romance novel sex: "he thrust his throbbing manhood into her moist, yielding femininity." Hee hee.
[info]renatus wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 04:09 pm (UTC)
Before I started reading your journal, I was ambivalent about writing sex scenes. I rarely minded them when I came across them in other people's work (even though many seemed really silly or useless), but I kept hearing opinions about how sex scenes were always gratuitous or boring or just plain bad and I shouldn't write them and I got itchy about including them at all--even when I had a vague feeling that the sex scenes (or nearly-sex scenes) I'd planned in the things I was writing did something useful and needed to be there.

Reading your journal and repeatedly reading you talk about how scenes are there to develop plot, reveal character, create tension, worldbuild, and entertain put my gut feelings into useful words and understand what I was doing with those scenes I felt needed to be there, and why.

Reading this again now makes me feel better about going back and fixing an almost-sex scene in the work I'm writing that's been bugging me since I wrote it because it's long and unwieldy and doesn't quite make the mark. Your post made me go, "Oh yeah. I need to figure out what this scene is supposed to be doing and make it do that."

So thanks, again, for sharing what you've learned, because it helps me understand what I'm flailing at and why I'm flailing at it.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 07:03 pm (UTC)
*g* The only rule is, do whatever you want, but make it not suck, I guess...
[info]nebula99 wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 05:50 pm (UTC)
Clunky sex scenes are such an issue that there is even a Bad Sex in Fiction Award *wink*

After I read this, I tried to think of novels I had read that had really good sex scenes, that were there for a purpose and not just because the writer thought that there "ought" to be some sex now. There aren't many. They tend to be either sex by numbers or overcome with purple prose. If someone is going to write about sex, they need to at least call a clitoris a clitoris. There's just no need for throbbing manhoods and quivering love buttons.

[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 07:02 pm (UTC)
If you click on the "Oh! Chairman Mao!" tag in the sidebar you will find some discussion of same, actually. ;-)

And I disagree. If the POV character would say "manhood," then the narrative should say "manhood."

Vocabulary choice is characterization.
(no subject) - [info]nebula99 - Nov. 24th, 2007 07:17 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Nov. 24th, 2007 07:21 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]hlglne wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 07:22 pm (UTC)
Since my so-called fiction is confined to adding in the sex i think is missing in Star Wars, I have no business saying anything about whether sex is superfluous to a narrative. Except that it's not superfluous in life,now, is it?

Boringly written sex even has its place, if it's between boring characters.

Out of character sex would be my sole squick. If Kool-aid gets you where you want to go, by all means Drink!
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 07:24 pm (UTC)
Lots of things that aren't superfluous in life are superfluous in art.

Art is the interesting-parts version of life.

Also, it sounds to me like you might be writing erotica, in which case, isn't the sex the point?
(no subject) - [info]andelku - Nov. 24th, 2007 09:08 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]paigemom wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 08:53 pm (UTC)
This should be required reading for anyone who writes slash fic...and the fact that this isn't required reading for anyone who reads slash fic is the #1 reason I don't read slash fic.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 09:02 pm (UTC)
Well, I suspect a lot of slash is written as erotica, which means that the sex *is* the point.
[info]smills47 wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 09:39 pm (UTC)
Also, by the time two people can carry the nookie off as if it were choreographed, it's probably started to get a bit dull.

Not necessarily ;)

OK, the deserved serious response: to me sex is basically a form of communication, and if the other forms of communication between two people aren't dull, then....

[info]wordswoman wrote:
Nov. 24th, 2007 11:30 pm (UTC)
>>Before you sleep with somebody, get them to help you move a large piece of furniture. <<

I love this! Here's my husband's version of it, developed this summer as we assembled a gas grill together: "Who needs couples therapy? If we want to know if our marriage is solid, all we need to do is assemble something complicated together."
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>

Profile

me and a troll
[info]matociquala
it's a great life, if you don't weaken
Elizabeth Bear Dot Com

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lizzy Enger