Nobody ever thinks of me as a short story writer, and it kind of makes me sad--because at heart, that's what I am.
Now, don't get me wrong. I love a good novel. I even like writing them, though I have to do it in a single enormous push of effort, because otherwise I get bored, bored, bored and wander off. I can't stand the endless tinkering that some writers do, the working on the same project for years on end.
I can't bear it.
(I get bored anyway, but if I'm working on a book for six months, I can stand the boredom. By the time the 37th revision rolls around, though, I am stultified.)
And novels tend to move so slowly. Hundred of pages, and barely enough plot for a good novelette!
You can actually spot the short-story-writer DNA in my novels, even the long ones. That thing people talk (complain) about, where too much happens too fast and it's too dense, too hard to keep control of? I suspect it's directly related to the author (me) being a short story writer at heart. Because I really believe in my heart that if a paragaraph is not doing three (and preferably five) things, it is not doing enough work. (The five kinds of work a paragraph can do in a work of fiction are: increasing or resolving tension (plot), exposition, worldbuilding (setting), developing character, and illuminating theme).
So I try to have small reversals and revelations on every page. Which sort of makes my books bad for reading quickly, I am told.
And I love writing short stories. I love the feeling of accomplishment they bring. I love how they are tiny perfect jewels, when done right, and they are just there breathing and making you sad or glad or sorry or melancholy or joyous or a little hollow under the breastbone.
And so I have a problem. Because really, the reason I write is to be read. I write to an audience (you guys, ora fraction of you guys.) And there's a dramatic tension there, of course, because while writing to that audience I am trying to stay true to my artistic vision (such as it is) and tell stories I can be proud of.
And short stories make me sad. Because they just vanish. They hang around for a month or so, and then drop back into nonexistence, never to be seen again. And nobody ever reads them again. They go to the Island of Misfit Stories, and hang around unread with their pals.
And I think I would feel better about that if I knew I'd be able to print collections, eventually, but really--the odds of my selling another collection in the next ten years is pretty slim. And I have a little pile here, of unreprinted stories of which in some cases I am inordinately fond, and I would like to be able to let people read in book form. The stuff that's collected in The Chains That You Refuse--some of it, I am very proud of. The title story, "Botticelli," "When You Visit The Magoebaskloof Hotel, Be Certain Not To Miss The Samango Monkeys," and so on. But I'm also very aware that those stories are my early work, and a lot of them are rough at the edges, insufficiently developed, heavyhanded, flawed in various ways.
And there's another book, book-and-a-half's worth of stuff that will likely slowly work its way up to my website, because that's the place I can put it where people will be able to read it. It's mostly small-press-published, because I'm mostly a small-press-published short-story writer, and it's mostly impossible to find otherwise, and I wouldn't expect anybody to spend ages tracking down a back issue of On Spec to read "Los Empujadores Furiosos," even though I love it. It's gone, more or less, like a song sung in an empty room. (I've written over sixty published pieces of short fiction at this point. Some of them are in The Chains That You Refuse, and some of them are in New Amsterdam. And then there's all this other stuff that's just, poof, gone. Good stuff, some of it, I think. "Orm the Beautiful," and "Tideline," and "The Inevitable Heat-Death of the Universe," and "Sounding," and "Love Among the Talus," to name a few.
I love those stories. And yet--
--there they go.
And that makes me wonder why I write stort stories, when they're so ephemeral, and so few people read them, and really, they're more work per square yard than any novel will ever be, and at the end of the day I know they have a limited lifespan and then vanish. It seems like so much work for something that will more or less fall of the edge of the earth and never be seen again.
I guess I write them because I love them.
And what happens after that is between the story and the world.
Now, don't get me wrong. I love a good novel. I even like writing them, though I have to do it in a single enormous push of effort, because otherwise I get bored, bored, bored and wander off. I can't stand the endless tinkering that some writers do, the working on the same project for years on end.
I can't bear it.
(I get bored anyway, but if I'm working on a book for six months, I can stand the boredom. By the time the 37th revision rolls around, though, I am stultified.)
And novels tend to move so slowly. Hundred of pages, and barely enough plot for a good novelette!
You can actually spot the short-story-writer DNA in my novels, even the long ones. That thing people talk (complain) about, where too much happens too fast and it's too dense, too hard to keep control of? I suspect it's directly related to the author (me) being a short story writer at heart. Because I really believe in my heart that if a paragaraph is not doing three (and preferably five) things, it is not doing enough work. (The five kinds of work a paragraph can do in a work of fiction are: increasing or resolving tension (plot), exposition, worldbuilding (setting), developing character, and illuminating theme).
So I try to have small reversals and revelations on every page. Which sort of makes my books bad for reading quickly, I am told.
And I love writing short stories. I love the feeling of accomplishment they bring. I love how they are tiny perfect jewels, when done right, and they are just there breathing and making you sad or glad or sorry or melancholy or joyous or a little hollow under the breastbone.
And so I have a problem. Because really, the reason I write is to be read. I write to an audience (you guys, ora fraction of you guys.) And there's a dramatic tension there, of course, because while writing to that audience I am trying to stay true to my artistic vision (such as it is) and tell stories I can be proud of.
And short stories make me sad. Because they just vanish. They hang around for a month or so, and then drop back into nonexistence, never to be seen again. And nobody ever reads them again. They go to the Island of Misfit Stories, and hang around unread with their pals.
And I think I would feel better about that if I knew I'd be able to print collections, eventually, but really--the odds of my selling another collection in the next ten years is pretty slim. And I have a little pile here, of unreprinted stories of which in some cases I am inordinately fond, and I would like to be able to let people read in book form. The stuff that's collected in The Chains That You Refuse--some of it, I am very proud of. The title story, "Botticelli," "When You Visit The Magoebaskloof Hotel, Be Certain Not To Miss The Samango Monkeys," and so on. But I'm also very aware that those stories are my early work, and a lot of them are rough at the edges, insufficiently developed, heavyhanded, flawed in various ways.
And there's another book, book-and-a-half's worth of stuff that will likely slowly work its way up to my website, because that's the place I can put it where people will be able to read it. It's mostly small-press-published, because I'm mostly a small-press-published short-story writer, and it's mostly impossible to find otherwise, and I wouldn't expect anybody to spend ages tracking down a back issue of On Spec to read "Los Empujadores Furiosos," even though I love it. It's gone, more or less, like a song sung in an empty room. (I've written over sixty published pieces of short fiction at this point. Some of them are in The Chains That You Refuse, and some of them are in New Amsterdam. And then there's all this other stuff that's just, poof, gone. Good stuff, some of it, I think. "Orm the Beautiful," and "Tideline," and "The Inevitable Heat-Death of the Universe," and "Sounding," and "Love Among the Talus," to name a few.
I love those stories. And yet--
--there they go.
And that makes me wonder why I write stort stories, when they're so ephemeral, and so few people read them, and really, they're more work per square yard than any novel will ever be, and at the end of the day I know they have a limited lifespan and then vanish. It seems like so much work for something that will more or less fall of the edge of the earth and never be seen again.
I guess I write them because I love them.
And what happens after that is between the story and the world.
- Mood:
nostalgic - Music:NPR - Wait Wait Don't Tell Me

Comments
As for the second, anyone doing a War Machines or something can grab that.
Who knows how the technology will shake out (like Hamilton's datasphere or somesuch), but something on the web and the wayback machine might get noticed long after novel X. So the website thing perhaps a good strategy, for fiction immortality of a sort.
Or, how many Andre Norton novels are lying around the bookshelves of people reading your livejournal, for example (other than the gutenberg variety, that is). Or even being read? Being a grandmaster and all.
Even your Kress/Reed/Swanwick types haven't got tons of collections, I think?
There was a mailing list discussion of longest wait for something like that for a writer - 50/60 years or something perhaps for one still living.
So with 2, you are doing pretty well already it would seem.
From other discussions obviously some writer types would like to have the stuff published as soon as they have 8 stories to rub together for your bare medium collection median. Not the case here, of course, but presumably the idea here is to make these the better examples, in general?
That would be the desired outcome for those-who-buy, anyway. :)
er.
not that I have... um.
Yeah. (thank you)
The sole exception to this, this year, was Cormac McCarthy's THE ROAD...brilliant, IMO. But you, Bear, have inspired me with "Orm the Beautiful," to actively pursue getting my own pieces published, and I've published two, this year.
Dark Reveries accepted a piece, "Afternoon," for their June issue and they recently accepted "Savior" for their January issue. I am very proud of these pieces, but they wouldn't exist without being in a shorter format. Not only would I be bored, but I would've lost my readers...or worse, had none.
All this to say: I totally agree.
:+)
(2) Is it possible that you write short stories for the joy of it?
(3) Chapbook?
(4) I'm sorry.
There's just not enough places that will take them. So I end up writing fanfiction, because I can get people to read me that way. I feel kind of like I'm copping out, but hey. I'd really rather write tie-in books for television shows, so it's ... uh, it's like practice?
Don't people generally write anything because they love it? Either the writing or the characters or the attention or something?
Heh. I'm of the "love having written" school, personally. I love finished things. I love talking to people about the finished things. I love it when people get pleasure or comfort or insight from my work.
I love the characters, but they're around, you know? They live in my head.
Some of them, I am sad are made of fiction, because they are the best friends ever, and I would like to go out dancing with them, or play cards, or buy them a beer. Like Matthew and Jenny and Elspeth and Chaz and Daphne and Kit and Cricket and Gourami and Jackie. I *love* those guys.
On the other hand, as a writer, someone just yesterday was asking what stuff I had published that they could go read, and I had to tell them that most of the shorts were gone now and unobtainable except on my hard drive...
Great short stories have a way of staying with me far more than novels do. I remember all the stories of yours I've published and particularly love your Lovecraftian stories (but you knew that).
I tend to agree about great short stories.
They cling.
You could do an experiment and self publish a short-story collection as an e-book...
How practical would an e-book only collection be? Short stories are almost the perfect thing for e-books IMO, since you can dip in and read a story or two while waiting for the bus/train/doctor/Second Coming.
The two shorts that immediately pop out as having stayed with me are "We can get them for you wholesale" and "Columbus was a dope." Otherwise...well, The Things They Carried isn't a short story collection, even though it masquerades as such. It's not a long list of memorable works.
I get it even worse than you -- people tend to forget I write fiction at all, and focus instead on my nonfiction and my editorial work.
I keep meaning to do a review or something of The Chains That You Refuse, which as you know I much enjoyed.
For me, my nonfiction usually sinks without a ripple....
You don't have characters or worlds you like to revisit?
Once a character's story is over, it's over.
Some character's stories don't fit in one book, of course. But these endless series full of wallowing characters? So not me.
One work that achieves poetry at novel length is John Crowley's Little Big.
Alas, it falls apart for me as a narrative in the last hundred pages.
I love novels but the truth is novels are like taking a vacation to a place and then leaving again. You have a great time there, but there is a plane to catch to the NEXT novel.
But short stories. Man, great short stories are like fucking shards of glass that you stepped on. Now they are IN you and are working there way toward your heart. I mean short stories can kill you years after you read them. Clear and sharp and painful and once you put your foot on one just right they become a part of you forever. The piece of paper with the black dot. That creepy yellow wallpaper. "I would prefer not to." I just read a story by John Barth the other night that is STILL niggling at me: My god WHO IS TELLING THE STORY? I keep asking myself that, over and over.
I love poetry. I love novels. I love non-fiction. But only short stories get inside me in that amazing way. They don't disappear. I don't think so. They go inside the reader forever. Become part of the reader in a way a novel never, ever can.
And I think the reason that short stories are not as popular as novels is because most readers can't take the intensity of what happens when a great short story pierces you in that way.
I'm glad you love short stories. I hope you continue to write them. I think maybe writing a truly great short story is a much greater accomplishment than writing a great novel. It won't make you money and it won't make you famous but something you wrote will INFECT people's brains forever. I think that is remarkable.
Well, it's already been said a few times upstream, but know that there are some of us who read (and buy!) them.
;-)