Previous Entry | Next Entry

sf farscape leather
I've been thinking for a couple of days about how I wanted to blog this, because there's something cool going down in the internets right now that makes all the little Future Detector hairs stand up on the back of my neck. Some of you--many of you--will have already seen links to Anonymous floating around. (Warren Ellis has been blogging it heavily, for one thing.) For those of you who haven't, Anonymous appears to be a viral information campaign aimed against the Church of Scientology.

I'm wondering if it will be effective.

Here are two videos:

One:



Two:



As near as I can tell, whoever is behind it is basically trying to hack the Internets as a messaging medium for cool, and use it to spread an idea/meme. And the reason why I suspect it might work is because it's basically fighting meme with meme. Activism done syberpunk.

I can't wait to see if it works.

What strikes me about this is that it's an absolutely brilliant use of the internet, and the sort of thing that SF and comic book writers have been talking about for decades. Viral videos and manifestos. Propaganda. Meme against meme.

It consists of a lot of the same techniques that revolutionary organizations have been using for years to affect social change, but tailor-made to the internet. Because the internet loves cool. And this is cool. And the internet loves catchphrases.

We are Anonymous. We are legion. Expect us.

Yeah, you can dance to that.

The coolest thing about it is that whoever is behind it is swinging two powerful tools. One is the sowing of massive FUD* among the enemy. Who are these people? What are their resources? Is it just some whackjob in a basement with a video editing program? Or is it a lot of people?

The second is that even if it is just one guy in a basement , as the meme spreads and replicates, the fact that maybe it's a guy in a basement means absolutely nothing. Because it's not a guy in a basement anymore. It's a million guys in a million basements. Because suddenly everybody who ever thought Scientology was a little scary has a peg to hang her hat on. We are legion. She has a place to go now.

And the guy in that basement has an advantage, as [info]cristalia points out. Because he's the hero of the story. The narrative is on his side. He's V.

And a meme ain't nothing but a narrative.

And a religion is a kind of meme.

ETA: [info]cristalia on Anonymous as meme technique, with special attention to ARG tools.



*Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt



I'm fascinated by this, in part because in no small part, this kind of optimizing narrative for the internet is one of the things that I really want to do with Shadow Unit. One of the things I have been saying is that before Hill Street Blues, nobody knew how to write or shoot, how to tell stories for TV. They knew how to tell stories on stages and in movie theatres and in novels, but TV is different.

Now, I'm not saying that what we're trying to do is the equivalent of something like Hill Street Blues. One, I'm not that arrogant. And two, it's not that big a deal. But I think everyone involved in the project has come into it with the understanding that we don't yet really know how to tell stories using the internet. And the ARG people have a piece of the puzzle, and the blog RP people have a piece of the puzzle, and the internet serializers have a piece of the puzzle, and the hypertext people have a piece of the puzzle, and the meme jockeys have a piece of the puzzle.

But TV is not a stage play or a movie or a Sunday serial.

So right now, we don't know how to tell stories for the Internet.

But we're learning. Oh, heck yeah.

Comments

( 117 comments — Leave a comment )
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
[info]ronin_kakuhito wrote:
Jan. 26th, 2008 11:26 pm (UTC)
I love this one.
And it scales based on how interested you are in the particular cause. If you are frantically anti-Scientology you can actively spread the meme, but if they just bug you a bit, mentioning it, maybe posting the catch phrase here and there, all of that kind of thing, it all adds to the background noise making it harder for the traditional Scientologist methods of fighting memes (harassing people) to work. <3 the Internet. <3 the Eternal September.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 26th, 2008 11:33 pm (UTC)
What I think is also very cool and meta about this?

One can support the meme and dissect the meme simultaneously, in this totally selfconscious recursive way.

All we're doing when we analyze is giving it google juice.

I love the internets.

They are my home.

[info]magentamn wrote:
Jan. 26th, 2008 11:35 pm (UTC)
"Anonymous Steps up it war against Scientology" is listed on Google News. Which means it's ALL over the 'net. People know.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 26th, 2008 11:43 pm (UTC)
Yeah, it's getting google juice from all over. I'm wondering if it's going to *work*, however.
[info]carla_scribbles wrote:
Jan. 26th, 2008 11:35 pm (UTC)
Oh my fuck, that is cool. Very Serenity of them.

It iz can be future tiemz nao?
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 26th, 2008 11:53 pm (UTC)
"This is the Internets."
If you poke around a bit, you may find a great deal of Anonymous.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yozvaMGkDjo

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SewQV9DXCYo&NR=1

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjLG8kN5AuQ

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIZ9o1ntOW4

etc.

Nonlocalized guerilla Internets activism. If there's no central organization, there's nothing to fight.

It's kind of stunning. The Viet Cong goes meme warrior.

Edited at 2008-01-26 11:55 pm (UTC)
Re: "This is the Internets." - [info]carla_scribbles - Jan. 26th, 2008 11:57 pm (UTC) Expand
Re: "This is the Internets." - [info]matociquala - Jan. 27th, 2008 12:02 am (UTC) Expand
[info]magicnoire wrote:
Jan. 26th, 2008 11:56 pm (UTC)
Who are these people? What are their resources? Is it just some whackjob in a basement with a video editing program? Or is it a lot of people?

Actually, they came from the depths of 4chan, who brought us lolcats. Although other sites like Ebaumsworld joined in the fun once it started. This is part of Project Chanology.

...I'm kind of embarrassed I know this.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 26th, 2008 11:58 pm (UTC)
Yeah, but you're missing my point. The thing is, the meme is unleashed.

It's a real thing now.

Want a DDOS? Ask the internets.

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlTV_Gkf1-o&feature=related
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 01:30 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Jan. 27th, 2008 01:34 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 02:18 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 08:36 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]magistera wrote:
Jan. 26th, 2008 11:57 pm (UTC)
The thing is, though, Anonymous is more about internet drama than anything else. They're a bunch of '/b/tards' from 4chan/7chan, and this isn't their first 'raid' - the last one I remember coming to my attention was a series of coordinated attacks on feminist blogs. They're pretty indiscriminate in choosing their targets - all they really care about is the drama, and lowering the signal-to-noise ratio on the internet.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 12:00 am (UTC)
Again, you're missing the point. Once the meme is of the leash, there's no telling what happens next.

It's just a meme.

But a religion is just a meme.

I'm not saying it *will* have any effect. I'm saying it could. And the manipulation interests the fuck out of me.
(no subject) - [info]cristalia - Jan. 27th, 2008 12:02 am (UTC) Expand
[info]chibicharibdys wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 12:02 am (UTC)
Oh, 4chan is finally harnessing the power of Anonymous for good. I'm so proud of them.

I heard from a /b/tard (my younger brother) that this started on Gaia Online, because the 3rd-level member of Scientology that recently outed Scientology as a cult posted on Gaia.

What will be interesting is when those /b/tards grow up and realize that they can actually do shit beyond taking websites down for a while. Maybe this is the first step.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 12:05 am (UTC)
Yeah. I am, right now, totally fascinated in watching what the Internets are growing up to become. I suspect we're getting bored with porn and IM, and trying to figure out what the next thing you can use a GIANT LIMITLESS SOCIAL NETWORKING TOOL FOR might be.
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 01:33 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Jan. 27th, 2008 01:35 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]dichroic - Jan. 27th, 2008 02:09 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 02:32 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]dichroic - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:06 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:57 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:58 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 04:46 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]dichroic - Jan. 27th, 2008 04:32 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 05:01 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]dichroic - Jan. 27th, 2008 07:10 am (UTC) Expand
Entirely off-topic - [info]cristalia - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:42 am (UTC) Expand
Re: Entirely off-topic - [info]dichroic - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:48 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]stwish - Jan. 27th, 2008 01:34 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]ronin_kakuhito - Jan. 27th, 2008 02:11 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]cristalia - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:43 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]ronin_kakuhito - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:58 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]cristalia - Jan. 27th, 2008 04:01 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]ronin_kakuhito - Jan. 27th, 2008 04:05 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]cristalia - Jan. 27th, 2008 04:15 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - (Anonymous) - Jan. 27th, 2008 09:17 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]belmikey wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 12:03 am (UTC)
One of the things I have been saying is that before Hill Street Blues, nobody knew how to write or shoot, how to tell stories for TV. They knew how to tell stories on stages and in movie theatres and in novels, but TV is different.

I think there's something to this. Actually, I think this is a lot to this. As the kind of geek who will happily watch an episode of Classic Trek followed by an episode of DS9 (try "Trouble with Tribbles" back to back with "Trials and Tribbleations"), or an episode of 1960s-era Doctor Who followed by an episode starring Mr David Tennant, I think you can see this very starkly.

Even in the late 60s, when Trek was coming on the air, and videotape technology was allowing things to be recorded other than 'as live', everything still feels stagey. Of course, shows recorded in front of a live audience, as many sit-coms were, are even more obviously so, since their sets are set up more or less like a stage set would be...

Edited at 2008-01-27 12:03 am (UTC)
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 12:08 am (UTC)
Yup.

New media requires new narrative techniques.
Ree Hill Street Blues comments - (Anonymous) - Jan. 27th, 2008 09:50 am (UTC) Expand
[info]akycha wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 12:03 am (UTC)
It's jazz. This is exactly jazz.

Science fiction authors DO predict the future!
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 12:07 am (UTC)
It's something.

It's spraypainting walls for the internet era.
[info]purplecthulhu wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 12:15 am (UTC)
There was a report that there was a DOS attack on Scientology servers and that anonymous was behind it (not sure where the report was from - sorry). Did they do it, or was it someone inspired by the meme to do it?

This seems a bit reminiscent of Gibson's 'Pattern Recognition' and Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Unit' and I'm so glad that those nice friends of Tom Cruise are the targets.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 12:23 am (UTC)
I have no idea, and that's what's interesting.

But if you poke youtube a little, it kicks up this:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlTV_Gkf1-o&feature=related

Monday, I will be tuned in.
(no subject) - [info]purplecthulhu - Jan. 27th, 2008 12:33 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]fireriven - Jan. 27th, 2008 05:51 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]labelleizzy - Mar. 5th, 2008 07:21 am (UTC) Expand
[info]rednikki wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 12:15 am (UTC)
I hate to say it, but these videos bore me so much I can't get through them. So, for me, not an effective meme. Will be interesting to see how it evolves, though.
[info]heimshal wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 01:34 am (UTC)
*laughs* It's so funny to read your post and then two posts down.
[info]hotbadgerdeluxe wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 12:31 am (UTC)
Quite brilliant. I've posted these on wherever I could.
[info]copperwise wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 01:01 am (UTC)
I hadn't seen anything about it until this post. It gave me chills. And you're exactly right, it doesn't matter if it was started by a 14-year-old drama ho or a guy in his basement. It doesn't, because it's out there now. Everyone who sees one of those videos and says "fuck yeah" is now Anonymous. Everyone who stops and thinks is now Anonymous.

I thought, "Heh, people will be making icons, must not give in to temptation to...wait a minute. They got me."

"You know, if one person, just one person does it they may think he's really sick and they won't take him. And if two people, two people do it, in harmony, they may think they're both faggots and they won't take either of them. And three people do it, three, can you imagine, three people walking in singin a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. They may think it's an organization. And can you, can you imagine fifty people a day,I said fifty people a day walking in singin a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. And friends they may thinks it's a movement."
[info]kiji_kat wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 03:26 am (UTC)
I agree wholeheartedly with everything you've said here. And you get today's Gold Star for posting lyrics from one of the best protest songs EVER.
[info]fledgist wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 01:02 am (UTC)
Quotes from Martin Luther King and Frederick Douglass? Cyberpunk liberation narratives? That's interesting.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 01:03 am (UTC)
Innit just?
(no subject) - [info]fledgist - Jan. 27th, 2008 01:25 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 01:35 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]fledgist - Jan. 27th, 2008 01:38 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 02:02 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]fledgist - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:05 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]cristalia - Jan. 27th, 2008 01:38 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 02:04 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]cristalia - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:46 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:50 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]webmaven - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:51 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:52 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]fledgist - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:02 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]dichroic wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 01:42 am (UTC)
Here's one that fascinates me, where someone took an older story and retold it via the Internet. Have you seen the Online Spoon River Anthology? It's the same kind of idea as recasting Pepys' diary as a blog, but fiction in this case - and I think it's at least equally successful, if less well known. In fact, there are so many internal links in Masters' original work that I think maybe hypertext is its proper medium, more than the original page ever was.
[info]jaybushman wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 04:40 am (UTC)
Funny that you mention it...
I'm working on a modernized adaptation of Spoon River Anthology using Social Networking as the medium. It's going to be the second piece of my Loose-Fish Project (www.loose-fish.com)

That site is great, and Paul has been really helpful to me personally. You'll see my comments all over his site.
Re: Funny that you mention it... - [info]dichroic - Jan. 27th, 2008 06:45 am (UTC) Expand
[info]remus_shepherd wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 01:43 am (UTC)
This is *not* meme versus meme. This is meme versus a psychotic, criminal organization that uses lawyers as smothering weapons.

This makes it extremely unlikely that 'anonymous' will succeed. And absolutely wonderful if it does. :)
[info]ronin_kakuhito wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 02:15 am (UTC)
I think that the win condition (achieved by other groups in the past) is to spread the meme without being intimidated or lawyered out of existence.
[info]stwish wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 01:43 am (UTC)
Ok, go for it.. Watching the global Brain hatch.. and the GB Group is so far behind it's just silly.

Back to Scumintology. I knew a family that escaped fro the "Church" back in the Ford Administration, and they had been really mind wiped by those assholes. So that makes the COS dangerous nuts in my book. Go get'm tiger..

btw, i lived with a rock band of apostate Mormons many moons ago, and got the impression that LDS was a sick bunch of fucks too.. I heard somebody on NPR say that he could never vote of any member of a "New" religion, one that hadn't gone around the reform/rebellion/counter-reformation mulberry bush a few time.

I think that COS is so conspiracy minded that this Anonymous meme is pretty much guaranteed to get way under their skin.. Plus Tom Cruise makes really crappy movies. Skroom
[info]shadowkat67 wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 02:00 am (UTC)
Well, Al Gore has been preaching for years that the internet is the most powerful medium out there and we should continue to fight like crazy to keep it free and uncensored. That if you want to get your point across use the internet. And I've already seen evidence of this - on Facebook and MySpace over 30,000 students across school districts in California managed to organize without anyone knowing and walked out to protest something.
Can't remember what the protest was about, just what they did and how astonished people were.

Fandom has used the net to organize fundraising campaigns - that include sending pizzas to striking writers.

Also the news on the net tends to be more reliable than television news not to mention faster. I often know about something if I'm online before someone who is just watching the nightly news or reading the paper does.

Then there's youtube - where you can post any video no matter how you film it - even if it is by cellphone. Kids can film teachers screwing up in the classroom and post it on the internet in a matter of minutes.

And as far as telling stories on the net is concerned? The sky's the limit. You can use pictures, video, spoken dialogue, or just words. Anything that can be posted can be used. Look at vids. Look at fanfic. I don't think we don't know how to tell stories for the internet, we just don't know which ones will sell.
[info]asklepia wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 02:13 am (UTC)
Thank you for the links - it's a fascinating issue. I agree that it transcends who Anonymous is/are, or whatever creed they support. Once the meme is released it cannot be controlled, and I'm very interested in seeing whether it is taken up in substance or merely observed as a fad. Whatever happens, the videos are cool.
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 02:37 am (UTC)
If you're really interested, you could be anonymous, too. All it really requires is that you have something to say, aren't afraid to pull punches, and have a strong enough stomach to float around 4-chan or 7-chan for a while. Don't leave the internet hyperactivism just to us! As they say, there's always room for one more.

Plus points of course for you being an intelligent human being. Some of anon is very much lacking in that department.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 02:42 am (UTC)
Hello, Anonymous.

If this sparks, it's going to take off beyond the bounds of /b/, isn't it? Anonymous is going to start speaking out and taking action without even being aware of the source of the meme.

(no subject) - (Anonymous) - Jan. 27th, 2008 05:59 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Jan. 27th, 2008 06:04 am (UTC) Expand
(Anonymous) wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 03:01 am (UTC)
Oh look! The translations have started showing up:

http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRjCBADIHDs


-- Anna
http://anna.slithytoves.org
[info]kiji_kat wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 03:12 am (UTC)
We are Anonymous. We are legion. Expect us.

Yeah, you can dance to that.


Please to be having ambient techno remix now? I don't care if it's experimental, dub, dance, whatever. I just want to hear those words used in a song, somewhere.

This post is absolutely brilliant, by the way.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 03:13 am (UTC)
Dunno about brilliant. *g* But thank you.
(no subject) - [info]kiji_kat - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:20 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:22 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]kiji_kat - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:26 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]heimshal - Jan. 27th, 2008 04:44 am (UTC) Expand
[info]timwb wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 03:15 am (UTC)
"they're a bunch of '/b/tards' from 4chan/7chan, and this isn't their first 'raid' - the last one I remember coming to my attention was a series of coordinated attacks on feminist blogs. They're pretty indiscriminate in choosing their targets - all they really care about is the drama, and lowering the signal-to-noise ratio on the internet."

Sorry if I don't join the dance. How long before the ZOG or Planned Parenthood becomes the hip target?

PS: it wasn't TV that improved its story-telling. Episode spanning story and character arcs exist in soap operas.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 03:42 am (UTC)
Here's the thing. You're thinking centralized.

That's the magic of a meme. It doesn't matter who starts it. What carries it--and the reason I think the "We are anonymous" tag is a stroke of propaganda genius--is sympathetic bandwidth.

Next time it will be Planned Parenthood. Or George Bush. Or whatever. Because anybody can use this tactic. The limiter is who picks it up, and how widely it spreads.

To put it in fannish terms, you can't stop the signal.

However, if nobody cares about the signal... then nobody receives it, and it doesn't matter at all.

(no subject) - [info]timwb - Jan. 27th, 2008 04:08 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Jan. 27th, 2008 04:14 am (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]speakertomgrs - Jan. 27th, 2008 01:40 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - [info]matociquala - Jan. 27th, 2008 01:45 pm (UTC) Expand
(no subject) - (Anonymous) - Jan. 27th, 2008 09:53 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]webmaven wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 03:31 am (UTC)
"The sort of thing that SF and comic book writers have been talking about for decades."

TV and movies too. Dark Angel, for example. Or, if you're willing to stretch the point a bit, 'The Corbomite Maneuver' in ST:TOS.

[info]callunav wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 03:40 am (UTC)
First of all, something about the image and especially the sound quality at the end of the first piece makes me wonder whether someone hasn't shown the make the studies demonstrating that subliminals are not effective. Weird bit of doubling on the sound.

Second, I find this interesting and your questions stimulating because I have no sympathy for the Church of Scientology. But if you're right that this is the forerunner of the trend, then how long before the religious right is propagating the same kind of meme-based Video Hatemail?

I find it hard to believe, listening to the fairly canned lines (clichés are clichés because they're effective) that anything much will come of it, but now that you've pointed it out, I look forward to finding out what actually does happen.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 03:44 am (UTC)
Techniques of propaganda and social consensus-building fascinate me, what can I say?
(no subject) - [info]callunav - Jan. 27th, 2008 03:58 pm (UTC) Expand
[info]stwish wrote:
Jan. 27th, 2008 04:03 am (UTC)
Btw, that's FFCC, Fun, Fantasy, Confusion and Chaos. "Stars My Destination"
Page 1 of 2
<<[1] [2] >>
( 117 comments — Leave a comment )

Profile

new england maple leaves manchesterct
[info]matociquala
it's a great life, if you don't weaken
Elizabeth Bear Dot Com

Latest Month

November 2009
S M T W T F S
1234567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lizzy Enger