I've been thinking for a couple of days about how I wanted to blog this, because there's something cool going down in the internets right now that makes all the little Future Detector hairs stand up on the back of my neck. Some of you--many of you--will have already seen links to Anonymous floating around. (Warren Ellis has been blogging it heavily, for one thing.) For those of you who haven't, Anonymous appears to be a viral information campaign aimed against the Church of Scientology.
I'm wondering if it will be effective.
Here are two videos:
One:
Two:
As near as I can tell, whoever is behind it is basically trying to hack the Internets as a messaging medium for cool, and use it to spread an idea/meme. And the reason why I suspect it might work is because it's basically fighting meme with meme. Activism done syberpunk.
I can't wait to see if it works.
What strikes me about this is that it's an absolutely brilliant use of the internet, and the sort of thing that SF and comic book writers have been talking about for decades. Viral videos and manifestos. Propaganda. Meme against meme.
It consists of a lot of the same techniques that revolutionary organizations have been using for years to affect social change, but tailor-made to the internet. Because the internet loves cool. And this is cool. And the internet loves catchphrases.
We are Anonymous. We are legion. Expect us.
Yeah, you can dance to that.
The coolest thing about it is that whoever is behind it is swinging two powerful tools. One is the sowing of massive FUD* among the enemy. Who are these people? What are their resources? Is it just some whackjob in a basement with a video editing program? Or is it a lot of people?
The second is that even if it is just one guy in a basement , as the meme spreads and replicates, the fact that maybe it's a guy in a basement means absolutely nothing. Because it's not a guy in a basement anymore. It's a million guys in a million basements. Because suddenly everybody who ever thought Scientology was a little scary has a peg to hang her hat on. We are legion. She has a place to go now.
And the guy in that basement has an advantage, as
cristalia points out. Because he's the hero of the story. The narrative is on his side. He's V.
And a meme ain't nothing but a narrative.
And a religion is a kind of meme.
ETA:
cristalia on Anonymous as meme technique, with special attention to ARG tools.
*Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt
I'm fascinated by this, in part because in no small part, this kind of optimizing narrative for the internet is one of the things that I really want to do with Shadow Unit. One of the things I have been saying is that before Hill Street Blues, nobody knew how to write or shoot, how to tell stories for TV. They knew how to tell stories on stages and in movie theatres and in novels, but TV is different.
Now, I'm not saying that what we're trying to do is the equivalent of something like Hill Street Blues. One, I'm not that arrogant. And two, it's not that big a deal. But I think everyone involved in the project has come into it with the understanding that we don't yet really know how to tell stories using the internet. And the ARG people have a piece of the puzzle, and the blog RP people have a piece of the puzzle, and the internet serializers have a piece of the puzzle, and the hypertext people have a piece of the puzzle, and the meme jockeys have a piece of the puzzle.
But TV is not a stage play or a movie or a Sunday serial.
So right now, we don't know how to tell stories for the Internet.
But we're learning. Oh, heck yeah.
I'm wondering if it will be effective.
Here are two videos:
One:
Two:
As near as I can tell, whoever is behind it is basically trying to hack the Internets as a messaging medium for cool, and use it to spread an idea/meme. And the reason why I suspect it might work is because it's basically fighting meme with meme. Activism done syberpunk.
I can't wait to see if it works.
What strikes me about this is that it's an absolutely brilliant use of the internet, and the sort of thing that SF and comic book writers have been talking about for decades. Viral videos and manifestos. Propaganda. Meme against meme.
It consists of a lot of the same techniques that revolutionary organizations have been using for years to affect social change, but tailor-made to the internet. Because the internet loves cool. And this is cool. And the internet loves catchphrases.
We are Anonymous. We are legion. Expect us.
Yeah, you can dance to that.
The coolest thing about it is that whoever is behind it is swinging two powerful tools. One is the sowing of massive FUD* among the enemy. Who are these people? What are their resources? Is it just some whackjob in a basement with a video editing program? Or is it a lot of people?
The second is that even if it is just one guy in a basement , as the meme spreads and replicates, the fact that maybe it's a guy in a basement means absolutely nothing. Because it's not a guy in a basement anymore. It's a million guys in a million basements. Because suddenly everybody who ever thought Scientology was a little scary has a peg to hang her hat on. We are legion. She has a place to go now.
And the guy in that basement has an advantage, as
And a meme ain't nothing but a narrative.
And a religion is a kind of meme.
ETA:
*Fear, Uncertainty, and Doubt
I'm fascinated by this, in part because in no small part, this kind of optimizing narrative for the internet is one of the things that I really want to do with Shadow Unit. One of the things I have been saying is that before Hill Street Blues, nobody knew how to write or shoot, how to tell stories for TV. They knew how to tell stories on stages and in movie theatres and in novels, but TV is different.
Now, I'm not saying that what we're trying to do is the equivalent of something like Hill Street Blues. One, I'm not that arrogant. And two, it's not that big a deal. But I think everyone involved in the project has come into it with the understanding that we don't yet really know how to tell stories using the internet. And the ARG people have a piece of the puzzle, and the blog RP people have a piece of the puzzle, and the internet serializers have a piece of the puzzle, and the hypertext people have a piece of the puzzle, and the meme jockeys have a piece of the puzzle.
But TV is not a stage play or a movie or a Sunday serial.
So right now, we don't know how to tell stories for the Internet.
But we're learning. Oh, heck yeah.
- Mood:
interested bear is interested

Comments
And it scales based on how interested you are in the particular cause. If you are frantically anti-Scientology you can actively spread the meme, but if they just bug you a bit, mentioning it, maybe posting the catch phrase here and there, all of that kind of thing, it all adds to the background noise making it harder for the traditional Scientologist methods of fighting memes (harassing people) to work. <3 the Internet. <3 the Eternal September.
One can support the meme and dissect the meme simultaneously, in this totally selfconscious recursive way.
All we're doing when we analyze is giving it google juice.
I love the internets.
They are my home.
It iz can be future tiemz nao?
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=yozvaMGk
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=SewQV9DX
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=wjLG8kN5
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=xIZ9o1nt
etc.
Nonlocalized guerilla Internets activism. If there's no central organization, there's nothing to fight.
It's kind of stunning. The Viet Cong goes meme warrior.
Edited at 2008-01-26 11:55 pm (UTC)
Actually, they came from the depths of 4chan, who brought us lolcats. Although other sites like Ebaumsworld joined in the fun once it started. This is part of Project Chanology.
...I'm kind of embarrassed I know this.
It's a real thing now.
Want a DDOS? Ask the internets.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlTV_Gkf
It's just a meme.
But a religion is just a meme.
I'm not saying it *will* have any effect. I'm saying it could. And the manipulation interests the fuck out of me.
I heard from a /b/tard (my younger brother) that this started on Gaia Online, because the 3rd-level member of Scientology that recently outed Scientology as a cult posted on Gaia.
What will be interesting is when those /b/tards grow up and realize that they can actually do shit beyond taking websites down for a while. Maybe this is the first step.
I think there's something to this. Actually, I think this is a lot to this. As the kind of geek who will happily watch an episode of Classic Trek followed by an episode of DS9 (try "Trouble with Tribbles" back to back with "Trials and Tribbleations"), or an episode of 1960s-era Doctor Who followed by an episode starring Mr David Tennant, I think you can see this very starkly.
Even in the late 60s, when Trek was coming on the air, and videotape technology was allowing things to be recorded other than 'as live', everything still feels stagey. Of course, shows recorded in front of a live audience, as many sit-coms were, are even more obviously so, since their sets are set up more or less like a stage set would be...
Edited at 2008-01-27 12:03 am (UTC)
New media requires new narrative techniques.
Science fiction authors DO predict the future!
It's spraypainting walls for the internet era.
This seems a bit reminiscent of Gibson's 'Pattern Recognition' and Ghost in the Shell: Stand Alone Unit' and I'm so glad that those nice friends of Tom Cruise are the targets.
But if you poke youtube a little, it kicks up this:
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=GlTV_Gkf
Monday, I will be tuned in.
I thought, "Heh, people will be making icons, must not give in to temptation to...wait a minute. They got me."
"You know, if one person, just one person does it they may think he's really sick and they won't take him. And if two people, two people do it, in harmony, they may think they're both faggots and they won't take either of them. And three people do it, three, can you imagine, three people walking in singin a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. They may think it's an organization. And can you, can you imagine fifty people a day,I said fifty people a day walking in singin a bar of Alice's Restaurant and walking out. And friends they may thinks it's a movement."
That site is great, and Paul has been really helpful to me personally. You'll see my comments all over his site.
This makes it extremely unlikely that 'anonymous' will succeed. And absolutely wonderful if it does. :)
Back to Scumintology. I knew a family that escaped fro the "Church" back in the Ford Administration, and they had been really mind wiped by those assholes. So that makes the COS dangerous nuts in my book. Go get'm tiger..
btw, i lived with a rock band of apostate Mormons many moons ago, and got the impression that LDS was a sick bunch of fucks too.. I heard somebody on NPR say that he could never vote of any member of a "New" religion, one that hadn't gone around the reform/rebellion/counter-reformation mulberry bush a few time.
I think that COS is so conspiracy minded that this Anonymous meme is pretty much guaranteed to get way under their skin.. Plus Tom Cruise makes really crappy movies. Skroom
Can't remember what the protest was about, just what they did and how astonished people were.
Fandom has used the net to organize fundraising campaigns - that include sending pizzas to striking writers.
Also the news on the net tends to be more reliable than television news not to mention faster. I often know about something if I'm online before someone who is just watching the nightly news or reading the paper does.
Then there's youtube - where you can post any video no matter how you film it - even if it is by cellphone. Kids can film teachers screwing up in the classroom and post it on the internet in a matter of minutes.
And as far as telling stories on the net is concerned? The sky's the limit. You can use pictures, video, spoken dialogue, or just words. Anything that can be posted can be used. Look at vids. Look at fanfic. I don't think we don't know how to tell stories for the internet, we just don't know which ones will sell.
Plus points of course for you being an intelligent human being. Some of anon is very much lacking in that department.
If this sparks, it's going to take off beyond the bounds of /b/, isn't it? Anonymous is going to start speaking out and taking action without even being aware of the source of the meme.
http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=sRjCBADIH
-- Anna
http://anna.slithytoves.org
Please to be having ambient techno remix now? I don't care if it's experimental, dub, dance, whatever. I just want to hear those words used in a song, somewhere.
This post is absolutely brilliant, by the way.
Sorry if I don't join the dance. How long before the ZOG or Planned Parenthood becomes the hip target?
PS: it wasn't TV that improved its story-telling. Episode spanning story and character arcs exist in soap operas.
That's the magic of a meme. It doesn't matter who starts it. What carries it--and the reason I think the "We are anonymous" tag is a stroke of propaganda genius--is sympathetic bandwidth.
Next time it will be Planned Parenthood. Or George Bush. Or whatever. Because anybody can use this tactic. The limiter is who picks it up, and how widely it spreads.
To put it in fannish terms, you can't stop the signal.
However, if nobody cares about the signal... then nobody receives it, and it doesn't matter at all.
TV and movies too. Dark Angel, for example. Or, if you're willing to stretch the point a bit, 'The Corbomite Maneuver' in ST:TOS.
Second, I find this interesting and your questions stimulating because I have no sympathy for the Church of Scientology. But if you're right that this is the forerunner of the trend, then how long before the religious right is propagating the same kind of meme-based Video Hatemail?
I find it hard to believe, listening to the fairly canned lines (clichés are clichés because they're effective) that anything much will come of it, but now that you've pointed it out, I look forward to finding out what actually does happen.