Previous Entry | Next Entry

writing matthew
There are only two reasons to do anything.

One is because it is needful.

The other is because it brings joy to you or others.

Tags:

Comments

[info]lissa_dora wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 01:33 pm (UTC)
What a beautiful thing to read first thing on a Monday morning! Thank you.

Do you mind if I quote you?
[info]matociquala wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 01:51 pm (UTC)
Not at all.
[info]lissa_dora wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 01:52 pm (UTC)
Huzzah! :-)

I am, by the way, loving Shadow Unit. Thank you.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 01:53 pm (UTC)
You are very welcome.
[info]lissa_dora wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 01:56 pm (UTC)
Mixed messages?
*smirk*

I'm not sure how welcome I should feel, with that icon.

Edited at 2008-04-28 01:57 pm (UTC)
[info]matociquala wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 02:00 pm (UTC)
Re: Mixed messages?
Huh? It's a writing icon.
[info]lissa_dora wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 02:01 pm (UTC)
Re: Mixed messages?
Aaah. When I pound my head on my desk, it usually indicates frustration. :-)

Then again, I play with numbers for a living. Numbers usually lead to frustration.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 02:05 pm (UTC)
Re: Mixed messages?
So does writing. *g*
[info]lissa_dora wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 02:06 pm (UTC)
Re: Mixed messages?
Fair 'nuff. I just don't do that for a living (yet).

[info]pnkrokhockeymom wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 01:34 pm (UTC)
That is very wise.

I seem to have trouble with the range of things I define as needful.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 01:55 pm (UTC)
Yep. Got the t-shirt.
[info]huladavid wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 02:07 pm (UTC)
Or in the case of milking cows, it's a combination of both.

Needful because without the milk you can't make cheese. Joyful because just image how good it feels to the cows to get that thing empty!!

(This message brought to you by Cummer's Perversion of Wisdom Service. Just remember our motto, Hey, we made Socrates look stoopid. )
[info]matociquala wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 02:40 pm (UTC)
Poor cows.
[info]supergee wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 02:53 pm (UTC)
H.L. Mencken said he felt the same way when he had finished writing something.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 02:56 pm (UTC)
It's actually pretty accurate, at least when the story's had time to fill up your head and get big and exert pressure.

Lately I'm doing more trying to scrape a little more mud from the dry well.... Which is a Sign, yanno?
[info]oursin wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 02:11 pm (UTC)
"Have nothing in your house that you do not know to be useful, or believe to be beautiful" (William Morris).
I find 'beautiful' there is a bit restrictive, because there is not necessarily a complete overlap between 'gives joy/pleasure' and beauty. Though I might make a case for the inner beauty of e.g. tatty old paperbacks.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 02:21 pm (UTC)
Beauty can be in sentiment. *g*

Thus the "believe."

(One's spouse or aged dog might also fall under those qualifications, especially after a number of years. ;-) )

Also, tatty paperbacks have a high R-value.
[info]jalilifer wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 07:43 pm (UTC)
I think it all depends on how you define beautiful. To me, a beautiful thing is something which creates a joyful response. Something can be pretty to look at it, without being beautiful.

Come to think of it, that works for people, as well.

[info]feyandstrange wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 10:25 pm (UTC)
I should have read the comments first; I just failed to properly quote Morris below. But I think Morris would re-cover all the tatty paperbacks in pretty slipcovers, or at least hide them somehow.

(envisions using Arts and Crafts wallpaper as slipcover paper)
(steps away from the cracky craft idea and gently hangs a curtain over the bookshelf instead)
[info]nicked_metal wrote:
Apr. 29th, 2008 12:00 pm (UTC)
Only if the tatty covers made the paperbacks less beautiful.
[info]stillnotbored wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 02:26 pm (UTC)
=)

::loff::
[info]rahaeli wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 02:45 pm (UTC)
What a lovely way of putting it.
[info]heimshal wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 03:09 pm (UTC)
I'm sure Marcus Aurelius would approve.
[info]folzgold wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 03:39 pm (UTC)
Do you ever have trouble prioritizing this? Should you do things that bring joy to others more often than you? What if 'needful' doesn't bring joy that often?
[info]matociquala wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 07:16 pm (UTC)
Value judgments are not the Zen.

Think about that word "should" and where it's coming from.
[info]folzgold wrote:
Apr. 29th, 2008 06:35 am (UTC)
It's probably coming from feeling like I can't possibly accomplish everything that I want to. I've been feeling this more and more as I approach the end of college, so I don't know what that's all about yet.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Apr. 29th, 2008 11:46 am (UTC)
I am sorry for larding you up with unsolicited and possibly unwelcome advice, but I can't figure out how else to answer this.

You probably can't accomplish everything you want to. But you shouldn't let that stop your from trying.

This is what priorities are for.
[info]folzgold wrote:
Apr. 29th, 2008 03:03 pm (UTC)
I do really appreciate that you took the time to offer the advice. It's not unwelcome, and is something to think about.
[info]willshetterly wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 04:59 pm (UTC)
This is true. Which is why Madison Avenue does all it can to blur the meanings of "want" and "need."
[info]cristalia wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 05:15 pm (UTC)
I like.

And my avgolemono falls under both!
[info]matociquala wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 07:19 pm (UTC)
Yes.
[info]doortoriver wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 07:25 pm (UTC)
I'm glad you phrased that the way you did. It manages to include things that are fun for fun's sake, as well as real responsibility - while simultaneously excluding fun that harms others, or things that do no harm but absolutely no good or joy to anyone.
[info]renatus wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 08:34 pm (UTC)
I really needed to read this today, and didn't know it until I had read it. Thank you.
[info]feyandstrange wrote:
Apr. 28th, 2008 10:22 pm (UTC)
In a book on the Arts and Crafts movement, I ran across a quote from a period piece, I think a newspaper, in which a family decided to have a "William Morris day" and went through all their stuff. Dad would hold up a thing.

"Does anyone know this to be useful?"

"Does anyone find this to be beautiful?"

If it fails those tests, it went in the nineteenth-century equivalent of the Goodwill pile.

I have tried to use this test on many things since then, ad it seems to sum up a lot. Especially with the codicil philosophy of "Make the useful everyday things beautiful".
[info]nicked_metal wrote:
Apr. 29th, 2008 11:23 am (UTC)
Beautifully said.

Profile

me and a troll
[info]matociquala
it's a great life, if you don't weaken
Elizabeth Bear Dot Com

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lizzy Enger