Log in

bear by san

February 2017



Powered by LiveJournal.com
writing carnival

real magic can never be made by offering up someone else's liver.

Please read this linked post before proceeding. This post has been closed to new comments.

As this is an open letter, I believe it deserves an open response:

You're right.

You're pretty much right categorically and without exception, and I'm sorry to have mislead you for a moment into believing I think anything different. I will say that the book of mine you threw across the room is, in part, actually intended to address the point you make about it, but I obviously failed for you as a reader in doing so, and I'm sorry.

That racism serves a story is never an excuse, especially if the racism is unexamined. There's a fine line to walk, of course, because it's also racist to make people of color sacrosanct in fiction. The only long-term solution I am aware of is saturation: getting enough characters of color out there that each one stops being special by virtue of their color.

When I said that sometimes it helps to write as if somebody "happens to have" a particular background, what I meant was not that anything else is the default. I meant that the character needs to be a person first, rather than being a stereotype or a token. A person, in other words, not an archetype or a stereotype or a role. 

It's a hard thing to talk about, to explain, and we've seen enough evidence already this week that the same words can sound very different to different people.

My intention really is not to earn brownie points. It is, hopefully, to do something about your pain and lack, and my own pain and lack, and the pain and lack of my friends and family and random strangers on the street.

If I check in with friends to see if I'm making mistakes, it's because I would rather be part of the solution than part of the problem, and obviously I'm not doing it well enough yet.

ETA: Think VERY CAREFULLY before you comment on this post. And make damned sure you are being both polite and respectful of others when you do. Or I will close comments.

Oz has spoken.

deepad's essay, here, is also excellent.

(I do wish people would stop assuming I'm straight.)


There was the student who kept using 'Caucasian' to mean 'white' and who was upset when I said 'well, you know, the people of India are in that category as well, and so are the Ethiopians'. She seemed to think that I'd made that up.
ONe of the funnier come-backs I've heard was when one of my mates was suddenly accosted by a couple of drunk neo-nazis rambling about how aryans would come to power and Sridhar said "good, I'll get that power before you do".
Not bad!
I thought it was hilarious, the neo-nazis were mostly scratching their heads, wondering what the hell he was on about.
Indeed. The ghost of Max Müller was probably laughing his head off.
I have, at work, typed this author query many times: "'Caucasian' is a geographic designation referring to people from the Caucasus. Is that your meaning, or did you intend 'white'?"
Good point. I've mentioned, in class, communities of African descent in Abkhazia, and then said 'they're Caucasians, of course'. This has been met with confusion, and insistence that they couldn't be. Well, say I, they're in the Caucasus region, so they're Caucasian.
I didn't know about the Ethiopians, thanks!