Log in

sf sapphire and steel winning

April 2016



Powered by LiveJournal.com
david bowie realism _ truepenny

that's right you too can be the proud owner of the quality goes in before the name goes on

I've been asked to blog a bit more about what I mean when I talk about being an "auctorial construct." Since part of my mission statement in keeping this blog is to warn up-and-coming writers of the unsignposted potholes in the road, I think that's a fair request, even though the prospect makes me somewhat nervous. I can see the slapfight from here, and it scares me.

Still, this is for posterity, so I will endeavor to be honest.

This was in part inspired by an SF writer conversation about finding fan pages for yourself you had no idea existed and no part in setting up, and in part by a similar conversation about the infamous Youtube video "Fuck Me, Ray Bradbury," and whether it was creepy or awesome, and how it would feel to be the recipient of such an internet lustogram.

Context is NSFW, if you had any illusions otherwise:

I'm just in these last couple of years coming to realize that, to a lot of people (like, more people than I know in real life), I'm no longer a real person they don't know, or maybe know by reputation. Instead, I've become an auctorial construct, and it's very bizarre.

Essentially, I'm a fictional person to them.

And they feel like they have ownership of that construct/fictional person, and sometimes they get very angry when I persist in being me and not the person they imagined. Which, I mean--okay, yeah. It happens to actors and musicians and sports figures a thousand-fold more, and politicians build their careers on capitalizing on this effect, but boy it takes some getting used to.

Sometimes, it's a little like dealing with 5,000 high school crushes. Sometimes it's like dealing with 5,000 high school enemies. Sometimes, I learn things about myself I did not know from my Wikipedia page.

Part of the price of being a public person is not having a lot of control over what people say about you--or, more precisely, what they say about the auctorial construct they have created, that they think is you. It's the cost of celebrity. Even teeny tiny celebrity. Celebrity this big: ---><---

Everybody experiences through their own perceptual filters, you see, and everybody projects their deepest, most heartfelt hopes and dreads into what they read and watch and live. To narrow it down a little, it's how this flawed technological telepathy we call prose communication works. It's why a book can get under your skin and change you; because a book is a mirror. A funhouse mirror. (My former Viable Paradise roomie Cory Doctorow, who isn't very much like a lot of people seem to think he is, and who I like a lot, has a hypothesis that a lot of how we experience fiction comes from the workings of our mirror neurons. Which is to say, the same things that both give us empathy (if you believe that particular research), allow us to model the behaviors of others in advanceof experience ("Mom's gonna kill me!"), and also tend to lead us to project our own motivations onto others ("I know you're thinking about breaking up with me!").

So sometimes people I don't know see themselves, or the things they hate most, in me--the same way they would see those things in a fictional character. And sometimes they bond with those projections, or loathe them.

It's uncomfortable. It's uncomfortable stumbling across people claiming I said asinine things I never said, and that happens all the time, too.

Sometimes, I stumble across people claiming I said totally awesome things, or gave them great recipes I have never seen before. That's weird too, but doesn't quite give me the same frisson of omg people think I'm evil that the "Elizabeth Bear said she hates fanfiction" posts do, or the blog reviews where people say they want to stab me. 

It's just weird when people think they know what I think, you know? But I've come to realize that that's not about me; it's about them. I'm some guy who writes novels and climbs walls and reads too much and is unfortunately somewhat prickly and overdefended. I do not walk on water--except for now, when it's frozen all over the everything. I have a bad habit of seeing too many sides of most arguments, but I don't hate fanfiction. And I really don't hate queer people. Or most of the other things people keep saying I hate.

Except George W. Bush. I despise that shitnozzle, to use one of panjianlien's preferred terms.

In other words, people don't actually think I'm awesome. Or evil. (Well, my ex-husband might.) They think the Elizabeth Bear who lives in their head is these things.

Part of the job, I fear. At least we're not 1970s rock stars. We'd be spending all our time fielding questions about whether it was true we slept with David Bowie.

The nice thing is that this has led me to realize that the artists and public figures I admire, the ones who seemed bizarrely elevated to me--are pretty much going through the same weirdness every day. Which makes it easier not to pee my pants when I meet somebody whose work I desperately admire. (I still totally burst into tears when I met Peter S. Beagle though. Just so you know.)

It also makes me understand what it is that people get out of Real People Slash, though man, I tell you, I still find that all the squick in the world. Intellectual understanding =/= emotional understanding. (NB: I also do not hate RPS. It just gives me the horrors, because I can't disconnect it from the people behind it. I make an exception when they have been dead for over 200 years, however.)

So no, Rachel Bloom is not actually talking to the real Ray Bradbury. She's talking to the auctorial construct Ray Bradbury. And it's not all that different from me admiring Angela Bassett's guns circa Strange Days, or Matthew Yang King's abs, or Mandy Patinkin getting himself accidentally interviewed as a man-on-the-street in NPR's election coverage...

Projection and objectification. It's what's for dinner. I suspect all we can do is try to be self-aware about it, and realize that the person we think we admire without knowing them is a person, and they have a life outside our head. And that the fan who may be uncomfortably over-fixated and sending inappropriately suggestive emails is in fact responding to a deep internal need, and not us at all. 

Which I guess comes down to treating that person with compassion. 

...especially when it's so useful for us as artists to be able to illuminate and manipulate those feelings through the medium of fiction. Which is to say, we invite readers to project into and objectify our characters. It's one of the ways we get people to care about characters.

Like most tools, it cuts both ways.


Good stuff.

What do you think about an author deliberately creating a fictional construct of themselves? I was just reading Gail Carriger's Locus interview where she talks about creating the character of "Gail Carriger" for conventions and appearances as part of her branding. She works on specific costuming, language, and humor in order to package herself for her fans.
I strongly suspect it's self-defeating. Fans react negatively to perceived self-promotion beyond a fairly low and straight-forward level. And most people aren't anywhere near good enough actors to play somebody more interesting than themselves for any significant period of time...especially as improv, without somebody providing the good parts in a script.
That assumes that what the individual is attempting to do is a) self promote or b) play someone MORE interesting than themselves.

Rather than simply someone other than the day-to-day self that they feel should be rather more private/protected. And actually, that's not that hard at all. (Trust me.)

The purpose, rather, or at least my purpose when I do the same thing, would be to separate my actual self (the one who gets crabby when she doesn't have enough to eat and has days where she can't adequately access language, etc) from the person with whom everyone else interacts. And I do it all the time. My voice students don't get to interact with M the person (for the most part), they get to interact with the deliberate construct of M the voice teacher.
I identify with this. The person I try to be with my co-workers is pretty different from the person my poor boyfriend has to put up with when I get home at night-mostly because Extreme Introverts don't fare well at most jobs. =)
Fans of steampunk/quasi-Regencies might be totally into mannered self-representations, though. The taste for a single, effortless self is particular to time and temperament.
The same fanbase likes Jillian Venters for doing essentially the same thing. (So do I, actually. She's a nice lady.)

And yeah, what someone else said about the fanbase. We're talking about steampunks (as the people who will be interacting with her most while she's in-persona). Half of them will be in persona too, and the other half are already interacting with people who are. It's not the same as other fandoms.
I think it's yet another author behavior demonstrating our desperate need for control when we have so very, very little.

I'm not sure it accomplishes anything, but if it makes her happy, it's no weirder than the kind of spin control and persona building Hollywood expects of people.

I think this works very well for authors who are very shy and need the armor of a deliberately-constructed persona to be able to deal with their fans. Which, in many cases, is exactly what's going on.
But isn't putting on a persona exactly what a lot of us do at cons? Cons offer people the chance to play with their self image and the perceptions of others. Some people just play themselves, others take it much further. Is an author planning her costuming and a few good lines any different from someone else tooling up with a bat'leth and a few good limes of Klingon?

And I definitely identify with the idea of it as an armour for those too shy to cope with a con or fans otherwise. It was true for me going to cons as a fan, even if I was playing myself, so why wouldn't it be true if I was there as a writer?
In fact, you've put your finger on a basic divide that has caused quantities amazing pain to people in fandom over the years.

Some of us go to conventions because they're places where we can comfortably be ourselves.
I thought her persona was adorable.