Previous Entry | Next Entry

Lenny Bruce died for your sins.

  • Nov. 4th, 2004 at 9:13 PM
me and a troll
Because Kurt Vonnegut hasn't mentioned this yet:

In 1957, Lawrence Ferlinghetti was tried for obscenity for publishing Allen Ginsberg's poem "Howl," which contains, among other subtleties, the words "cock" and "cunt" used in a sexual sense, direct and graphic references to homosexual and heterosexual acts, and a scathing indictment of capitalism.

I have in my possession a framed page torn from an Utne Reader. This page contains a photograph, and that photograph shows several uniformed West Point cadets at a table, each of them reading intently from a copy of Howl and Other Poems.

Everybody knows the first line. The first line barely counts.

...who broke down crying in white gymnasiums naked and trembling before the machinery of other skeletons,

who bit detectives in the neck and shrieked with delight in policecars for committing no crime but their own wild cooking pederasty and intoxication,

who howled on their knees in the subway and were dragged off the roof waving genitals and manuscripts,

who let themselves be fucked in the ass by saintly motorcyclists, and screamed with joy,

who blew and were blown by those human seraphim, the sailors, caresses of Atlantic and Caribbean love,

who balled in the morning in the evenings in rose gardens and the grass of public parks and cemeteries scattering their semen freely to whomever come who may,

who hiccuped endlessly trying to giggle but wound up with a sob behind a partition in a Turkish Bath when the blond & naked angel came to pierce them with a sword,

who lost their loveboys to the three old shrews of fate the one eyed shrew of the heterosexual dollar the one eyed shrew that winks out of the womb and the one eyed shrew that does nothing but sit on her ass and snip the intellectual golden threads of the craftsman's loom,

who copulated ecstatic and insatiate with a bottle of beer a sweetheart a package of cigarettes a candle and fell off the bed, and continued along the floor and down the hall and ended fainting on the wall with a vision of ultimate cunt and come eluding the last gyzym of consciousness,

who sweetened the snatches of a million girls trembling in the sunset, and were red eyed in the morning but

prepared to sweeten the snatch of the sunrise, flashing buttocks under barns and naked in the lake...




I wonder, a little, if growing up in a lesbian household during the Reagan era has left me a little innured to disenfranchisement and silence. The Clinton era was a magical reprieve, for me--and not an unalloyed one. Slick Willy, after all, gave us "Don't ask; don't tell." But still, the fear that speaking my mind may have unintended consequences is not new to me. It is not a revelation.

And the fact remains, things are better now than they were then. Voices are louder, tolerance is greater, people who are 'different' are more accepted than they were. There was a time when I Spy was radical. Hell, there was a time when The Cosby Show was radical. A black family as Mr. and Mrs. America? A woman as Secretary of State? The issue of homosexuality addressed openly, in national debate? Obscene. Unheard of.

But now I speak the truth.

People died to win that discourse. And not one or two. Dozens. Hundreds. They died for the labor rights movement, and they died for women's suffrage, and they died for the rights of Native Americans, and they died for the rights of blacks and other ethnic minorities. I could name the names, or you can name them for yourselves. But it's a slower death not to speak; silence is death.

But. Genies don't go back in bottles. Or have we forgotten that, too?

Oh. And if you were counting, it's the 399th anniversary of Guy Fawkes Day. The soldier monk was a redhead, if you didn't know, and they say he was tall and comely.

He was also a scapegoat.

ETA:

[22:13] [info]katallen: penny for the guy, mister?
[22:14] [info]matociquala: okay, I just began to wonder if the expression "a fall guy" refers to Guido Fawkes.
[22:14] [info]matociquala: Because he was.
[22:14] [info]matociquala: The whole thing was Catesby's idea.
[22:15] [info]katallen: it was
[22:15] [info]matociquala: And maybe Tresham, before Tresham chickened out and turned the rest in--
[22:15] [info]matociquala: wow.
[22:15] [info]matociquala: you don't suppose--
[22:15] [info]matociquala: nah.
[22:16] [info]stillnotbored: what?
[22:16] [info]katallen: ::prods::
[22:16] [info]matociquala: Jaime.
[22:16] [info]matociquala: "A fall Guy."
[22:16] [info]stillnotbored: what?
[22:16] [info]matociquala: Guy Fawkes was set up by his co-conspirators.
[22:16] [info]matociquala: He was essentially left behind to take the blame while everybody else ran for it
[22:16] [info]stillnotbored: yes
[22:17] [info]matociquala: So I just clicked on maybe the etymology of that turn of phrase dates to him.
[22:17] [info]katallen: where do we get the whole 'guy' thing from anyway?
[22:17] [info]matociquala: That's what I'm wondering.
[22:17] [info]stillnotbored: ah I get it *g*
[22:17] [info]matociquala: Can I blog this? I bet somebody on my flist knows.

Comments

[info]timprov wrote:
Nov. 4th, 2004 09:58 pm (UTC)
You make me want to reread "The Cavin Coolidge Home for Dead Comedians."
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 4th, 2004 10:03 pm (UTC)
I don't know that one. Now I'm going to have to go looking.
[info]timprov wrote:
Nov. 4th, 2004 10:08 pm (UTC)
It's a Bradley Denton short story, one of my favorites.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 4th, 2004 10:20 pm (UTC)
Thanks!
[info]j_bluestocking wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 03:11 am (UTC)
I second the rec! A classic. I think it was in F&SF -- was it ever reprinted in book form?
[info]timprov wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 03:17 am (UTC)
It's in two of his colections: The Calvin Coolidge Home for Dead Comedians (obviously) and One Day Closer to Death.

The original F&SF pub was June of '88.
[info]samhudson wrote:
Nov. 4th, 2004 10:36 pm (UTC)
Dictionary.com says that all meanings of the word guy (except a rope that holds something up) are named for Mr. Fawkes.

It also says that there's Guy, AR (pop. 241) and Guy, TX. ^_^
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 07:27 am (UTC)
Whaddaya know. Every so often the sneaking suspicion gets one right. *g*
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 07:34 am (UTC)
ETA: Alas, apparenly Dictionary.com is incorrect. SOmbody with an OED weighs in downthread--
[info]algor wrote:
Nov. 4th, 2004 10:44 pm (UTC)
From www.mindlesscrap.com

Fall Guy
In the early 19th century, professional wrestling was a real, although relatively unpopular sport. It wasn't until promoters started attaching story lines to the show that people started taking notice. The use of story lines made it necessary to fix the outcome of the matches, with the loser taking the fall. In sporting circles, it became common to speak of a loser as a fall guy.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 07:36 am (UTC)
The problem with folk etymologies is that they usually arise from somebody going "huh," just like Kat and Jaime and I did, above--which is why I asked See below for the OED's answer.
[info]mevennen wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 01:49 am (UTC)
I'll be in the little English town of Lewes tonight, where one of the (alleged) conspirators came from, celebrating Guy Fawkes night - though what we're celebrating is never quite clear (remnants of Samhain fire festivals, most probably). A friend of mine won't be coming with me, as she was born in Guy Fawkes' old house and considers it disloyal...

Liz (Williams)
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 07:39 am (UTC)
Liz! Good to see you here, and welcome.

Come in, come in. Put your feet up.

I had a typical American's understanding of Bonfire Night (Mostly consisting of having read V for Vendetta once) until last year, when I started researching the Gunpowder Treason for Stratford Man.

And I was very surprised by how the reality differed from the legends.

I think theoretically we're supposed to be celebrating Mr. Fawkes' arrest and execution... but I'm a little fuzzy on that too.

Ah, well. Any excuse for a bonfire.
[info]supergee wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 04:19 am (UTC)
There is progress. I'm old enough to remember Joe McCarthy. My father was fired by the New York City school system for taking advantage of his constitutional right not to answer Roy Cohn's stupid and offensives questions. (He went into private tutoring and made more money, then was reinstated with full back pay.) I remember colored water fountains, though I was in what became a blue state and knew them only from news reports.

I'm hopeful, but I'm also thinking of the anarchist description of Guy Fawkes: last man to enter Parliament with honest intent.
[info]fidelioscabinet wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 05:53 am (UTC)
Absolutely. When I was a child, James Meredith was registered at the University of Mississippi only with the support of Federal troops, and George Wallace "stood in the schoolhouse door". Before he died, Wallace acknowledged that he and the others who tried to prop up Jim Crow had been wrong, and apologized. A lot of people went through hell to get him to that point, but he got there. My mother was born in 1916; this summer we were talking about the changed between then and now. She remembers when her mother voted for the first time, in 1920. Segregation, and the disenfranchisement of blacks was just the way things were. She also commented "When I was twenty, I had no idea that there were homosexuals--the concept was entirely foreign; people didn't mention things like that in rural Missouri. When I watched all those weddings in San Francisco on the news, the only thing I could think was that much loved and commitment deserved recognition. I'm sorry the older people had to wait so long; I hope the younger ones have at least as many happy years as I did with your father. And the children--if people have children, they ought be able to get married; it makes all the paperwork easier if something happens." It's easy to forget how far we've gone, but we have gone a long way indeed, and the only way we won't make more progress is if we stop walking. Sometimes you have to find a way around; sometimes there's no choice but to cross the bridge, whether they have dogs and firehoses waiting or not.
In the meantime, consider that this speech was once shocking, and now, to almost everyone, makes perfect sense. I'm sure she'd tell us to keep at it, but I think she say we'd managed to improve a little--slowly.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 07:53 am (UTC)
...In a moment of blinding synchronicity, they just played a few verses of "Strange Fruit" on NPR while talking about the movie Lightning in a Bottle.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 07:57 am (UTC)
Thank you for linking the Sojourner Truth speech. She's a hero of mine.
[info]fidelioscabinet wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 09:45 am (UTC)
She's a hero of mine.
And so she should be, and of us all.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 07:44 am (UTC)
I had never heard the anarchist description of Guy Fawkes, and I love it.
[info]fairmer wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 05:31 am (UTC)
The OED insists that "fall guy" is slang (orig. U.S.) and gives a non-Fawkesian origin. I'm v. sad. I think you should rewrite history for us.

But...

3b. An act of decamping or running off ‘on the sly’. to give the guy to: to run away from, ‘give the slip to’. Also to do a guy.

In half the senses of the word "guy" it seems to come from the same root that gives us "guide" but the rest, most common senses, Fawkes is your fall guy. So to speak.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 07:33 am (UTC)
Hah!

I love you and your OED. *g* I don't trust the American Heritage or Webster's to get things right. Noah was a revisionist....

Huh. Interesting how this leads us back to the terrorism discussion, isn't it?
[info]mevennen wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 07:49 am (UTC)
Good to be here!

Yes, it's supposed to be the celebration of his arrest. Lewes has had Bonfire Societies for about 170 years now, and they make a huge thing of it - torchlit parades and about half a dozen big displays around the town. They also burn papier-mache effigies of unpopular people - for example, past candidates have included most British politicians (all of our Prime Ministers, although I recall that Margaret Thatcher got burned several times).

There is a slight edge to the proceedings - a Catholic friend of mine isn't too happy about some of the comments that get shouted ("No Popery!") although she appreciates that the whole event is a historical relic. And it is a lot of fun, though it looks dangerous - fireworks get thrown and they roll blazing barrels of tar through the streets, but amazingly, the last major injury was sustained in the 19th C when someone blew up their own kitchen.

Liz
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 6th, 2004 11:44 am (UTC)
*g*

You know, that sounds like awfully good fun, except as noted the Popery part.
[info]fireflygirl wrote:
Nov. 5th, 2004 08:53 pm (UTC)
I wonder, a little, if growing up in a lesbian household during the Reagan era has left me a little innured to disenfranchisement and silence.

You too?

I've taken a lot of shit lately for supporting Kerry even though he believes marriage is between a man and a woman not to mention for supporting Clinton during 'don't ask, don't tell' insanity. Growing up afraid that I'd be taken from my lesbian mother might have something to do with it. Clinton's election was like an enormous weight lifted. This lumbering beast of a country can only be nudged in the right direction, it seems.
[info]matociquala wrote:
Nov. 6th, 2004 10:52 am (UTC)
Yes. I believe in pulling for *everything* I want, and accepting inches until I can get the miles.

And I remember the fear and silence of my childhood very well. And I am not going back.

Profile

me and a troll
[info]matociquala
it's a great life, if you don't weaken
Elizabeth Bear Dot Com

Latest Month

July 2009
S M T W T F S
   1234
567891011
12131415161718
19202122232425
262728293031 

Tags

Powered by LiveJournal.com
Designed by Lizzy Enger