When done right, comics are a cognitive whetstone, providing two or three or more different but entangled streams of information in a single panel. Processing what you’re being shown, along with what’s being said, along with what you’re being told, in conjunction with the shifting multiple velocities of imaginary time, and the action of the space between panels that Scott McCloud defines as closure...
--Warren Ellis
Word.
I have actually tried to do this in prose: Blood & Iron is the result, and as many can testify, using only one input stream for all those entangled information threads results in almost headsplitting density and limited success. (In your average comic panel, the streams may be visual/art/action/scene setting, narration, internalization, dialogue/thought, and white space. Yeah, think about that for a moment, and consider that maybe I missed one. Or two. And that they can contradict or ironicize each other.)
Comics are cool. They are an interstitial art form all in their lonesome.
- Mood:
accomplished - Music:Eurythmics & Aretha Franklin - Sisters Are Doin' It For Themselves
“Be kind, for everyone you meet is fighting a great battle.”
--Philo of Alexandria
- Mood:
contemplative - Music:NPR - Morning Edition
“Your voice is more important than your fear."
- Mood:
cheerful - Music:Ellen McIlwaine - Can't Find My Way Home
--Sarah Monette
- Mood:
amused - Music:'scuse me while I kiss this guy
- Mood:
amused - Music:NPR- Morning Edition
absolutely true to their nature
are rabbit dogs and electric fences,
since both are singular in purpose.
Have I infected all livejournal with the unrelated-song-lyric-as-post-title thing?
It seems I have.
I should be revising right now, but somehow, I am reading magazines. Ah well. There are many hours between now and bedtime.
- Mood:
contemplative - Music:Led Zeppelin - Your Time is Gonna Come/Black Mountain Side (Radio Paradise - DJ-
"Serendipity is when you find things you weren't looking for because finding what you were looking for is so damned difficult."
-- Erin McKean, Lexicographer
Oh yah. That's going in a book.
Also, the Rives four in the morning rap is making me wish I still wrote poetry, and still poetry slammed....
- Mood:
contemplative
1.) I am out of Kelpie books. I did not need another Kelpie song now, because Kelpie songs breed Kelpie stories, and we can't currently be having that. And yet, the world sends me Kelpie songs.
He could put me high on a pedestal
He could rob me all of my shame
He could hold me under water
Till I could not remember my own name
2.) Page ~330 of the b&%k, and the party has finally assembled. You know, I've run role-playing games like that.
3.) via
4.) I have gotten to the scene where Cahey makes his terrible mistake. (Yes, after saying I was quitting for the day, I went and wrote another 500 words. Because I couldn't concentrate on anything else. Even though I haven't practiced guitar in a week, and I have Netflix stuff to watch. For new readers: I always get like this around this part of the book. Aren't you glad you don't live with me?) That is why I am writing blog posts and goofing off on the internet rather than writing this scene, because it's a big giant setpiece thingy, and I am feeling blah.
In a minute, I will probably go start it anyway, because, well, I can't concentrate on anything but the book. Even the wonders of Chuzzle and Bejeweled fail to distract me.
If you think is bad, you should see what I'm like the week after I finish a first draft.
If I were any kind of a sensible writer, conscious of my image, I would delicately elide this part of the process, but what we're here for is to provide insight into the life of the working artist. So you get a front-row seat for the thrashing.
At least I have a Richard Thompson concert to distract me tomorrow night. And the damned heat has finally broken. The Presumptuous Cat is sacked out in the bedroom, which has been closed off for the past three days because it faces Southeast and whoa nellie the sun and the hot. She might forgive me for locking her away from her bed sometime this year.
5.) Let us rise up and be thankful, for if we didn't learn a lot today, at least we learned a little, and if we didn't learn a little, at least we didn't get sick, and if we got sick, at least we didn't die; so, let us all be thankful.
--Gautama Buddha
- Mood:
okay. for certain values of okay. - Music:Thea Gilmore - Sugar
347 / 400 (86.8%) |
That's actually only about 2500 new words, but I took all the chunks of the old novel that I'm saving for re-use and stapled them in. I expect they will get much shorter when they are rewritten, as they badly badly need to be. Because they are ass, that's why. And because that thing where my brain tries to have six conversation in parallel was really prevalent in early drafts of this book. It all made perfect sense to me at the time it was written, but I look at it now and think, "Wow, this is random."
Also, when you actually put transitions and scene changes and all that stuff in a book, it makes it a heck of a lot longer.
I have in fact trained myself to be more linear. Hacking my own brain for your entertainment since ~2001.
Also, I got to write the scene where the sort-of-but-not-really-fallen-angel kisses the catslavegirl today. There was a lot of entertainment for my cat in this, as I kept poking at her face trying to figure out the structure of her mouth. Also, somewhere, Cordwainer Smith is just spinning. Or possibly laughing his ass off, one of the two.
Which leads me to a meditation of one of the worst pieces of writing advice I have ever recieved: the venerable and nonsensical, "don't write down anything your point of view character isn't currently noticing."
I suspect that's probably a good third of what's wrong with AtWS: The Original Narrative. Because I didn't. I stuck tightly to Muire's stream of consciousness, and to the action. Which meant there was almost no setting, no worldbuilding--except by incluing--no setting--except for whatever furniture was currently in use--and in general, king of a herky-jerky thing where the reader was adrift in this character's head and only aware of whatever she was focused on.
The first Jenny book has some of this problem too, but by the time I wrote that, enough of my first readers had complained often enough that I was starting to fix it, at least slightly.
Now, what does work is filtering the narrative through the character's perceptions so the reader sees what's important to that character. The murderer notices the knife on the counter; the hungry man notices the open box of Bugles. But part of building richness into a narrative is that incidental stuff, even if a real person would only notice it subconsciously. The texture of cloth, the movement of the air, an itch on an earlobe. It's immersion, grounding, and it matters.
Remember: just because people tell you something about writing, doesn't mean it's useful or true.
That of course goes for everything I say, too.
This morning, while I was sitting in my chair by the window writing, what I charitably presume to have been a very young sparrow got tangled in a spiderweb on my windowledge.
It appeared to be eating something--I presume either the spider, the egg case, or an insect husk, and in the process, sort of fluttered all over the windowledge and then clung to the screen for a while and got spiderweb all over itself and in general acted like it had no clue that I, and the Presumptuous Cat, were sitting a mere ten inches away.
The PC was eminently interested, too, but I got ahold of her before she could go through the screen and fall two stories, in pursuit of the daft thing.
Ever notice how much government resembles ten year old boys with secret clubhouse passwords?
Yeah, me too.
I just found a notebook with a bunch of pithy quotes I wrote down about fifteen years ago, for a purpose no longer relevant. If you like that sort of stuff, well, I'm putting the ones I want to remember here, for my own future reference. (There's a few I mean to use in Chill, for one thing.)
( here are some )
- Mood:
calm - Music:Elton John - Sixty Years On
Copycatted via
scarlettina, but worth quoting:
Some writing advice by Kurt Vonnegut Jr. on the subject of short stories, from Bagombo Snuff Box:
1. Use the time of a total stranger in such a way that he or she will not feel the time was wasted.
2. Give the reader at least one character he or she can root for.
3. Every character should want something, even if it is only a glass of water.
4. Every sentence must do one of two things -- reveal character or advance the action.*
5. Start as close to the end as possible.
6. Be a sadist. No matter how sweet and innocent your leading characters, make awful things happen to them -- in order that the reader may see what they are made of.
7. Write to please just one person. If you open a window and make love to the world, so to speak, your story will get pneumonia.
8. Give your readers as much information as possible as soon as possible. To heck with suspense. Readers should have such complete understanding of what is going on, where and why, that they could finish the story themselves, should cockroaches eat the last few pages.
*which is to say, create or resolve tension. --Bear
- Mood:
intimidated - Music:Vienna Teng - Gravity
- Mood:
working - Music:NPR - Morning Edition
"Nobody with a clean house ever wrote a book."
S'truth. Take it to the bank, baby.
- Location:profoundia
- Mood:
content - Music:Meredith Brooks - Shatter
--A rumour has come to me from Calchvynyd, The Book of Taliesin XVIII
- Mood:
talkative
sclerotic_rings, you will be missed. *loff*
Send postcards, son.
Progress notes for 14 June 2006:
"War Stories"
New Words: 2507
Total Words: (actual / ms) 2970
Pages: 14
Deadline: none
Reason for stopping: bed. An hour ago.
Stimulants: lagavulin 16
Exercise: bah, what's that?
Mail: via
coalescent, The Agony Column just gave me the Best Review Ever for TCTYR and B&I.
Mean Things: Where do I start? the head-shaving and the dying, I think.
Darling du jour: Goddamned terrorists. Bunch of fucking cowards. Any asshole can die for his country.
The scary shit is living for it.
Tyop du jour:
the moist, warm, tender skin of her name
the whole word's blowing up.
Books in progress: Martin Cruz Smith, Stallion Gate;
Interesting tidbits:
"Love is a perky little elf dancing a merry little jig and then suddenly he turns on you with a miniature machine gun."
-- Soren Kierkegaard?
the_monkey_king quotes Agatha Christie:
I changed from an amateur to a professional… which is to write even when you don't want to, don't much like what you are writing, and aren't writing particularly well.
Good night.
- Mood:
giddy - Music:Josh Ritter - Girl In The War / Janis Ian - From Me to You
The storyteller's intelligence is partly natural, partly trained. It is composed of several qualities, most of which, in normal people, are signs of either immaturity or incivility: wit (a tendency to make irreverent connections); a refusal to believe what all sensible people know is true; mischievousness and childishness (an apparent lack of mental focus and serious life purpose, a fondness for daydreaming and telling pointless lies); a marked tendency toward excessive eating, drinking, chattering and a weird fascination with dirty jokes; a strange mixture of playfulness and embarrassing earnestness; patience like a cat's; a criminal streak of cunning; psychological instability; and finally, an inexplicable and incurable addiction to stories, written or oral, bad or good.
--John Gardner
Unless you are a writer of some hard experience, it is challenging to understand this basic contradiction: the more intense and disturbing the content of a scene, the harder it is to write the damned thing without making it unintentionally funny.
The reader's defense mechanisms really pink up close to the surface when you start hacking limbs off or raping people. And that's not the sort of thing that you want to have provoke snickers.
Orgasms are challenging that way too.
Progress notes for 5 June 2006:
"Orm the Beautiful"
New Words: 347
Total Words: 347
Pages: 2
Deadline: none
Reason for stopping: I should not be working on this short story. I should be working on that book.
"Les Innocents"
(Please note, I have two unfinished New Amsterdam stories already started. I do not need a third one.
This one will tie up the arc, though.)
New Words: 48
Total Words: 48
Pages: 1
Deadline: none
Reason for stopping: I should not be working on this short story. I should be working on that book.
Patience & Fortitude
New Words: 68
Total Words: 7746
Pages: 35
Deadline: none
Reason for stopping: I should not be working on this book. I should be working on that book.
...now he's admitting to his girlfriend that he's been getting sex tips from a lesbian.
I love this character. He is such a giant dork.
Undertow
New Words: 1900
Total Words: (actual / ms) 58,821 / 67,750
Pages: 271
Deadline: August 1
Words per day to meet deadline: 566
Reason for stopping: end of scene. MUST SLEEP.
58,821 / 100,000 (58.8%) |
271 / 400 (67.8%) |
Two thirds of a book!
OMG, we really are in the homestretch now.
Stimulants: assam
Exercise: Gym with
ashacat, 90 minutes: weights, elliptical, rowing
Mail: I've been Thogged! What's really crushing to my poor underdeveloped ego is that I know there are far worse sentences in that book.
I find them every time I do a reading.
This is, alas, the reason why my draft manuscripts are spotted with highlighted text that when hovered, reveals comments such as "This is the worst paragraph in the history of paragraphs. Fix it."
It doesn't help.
Also, SF Signal feels metz-a-metz about Worldwired.
Today's words Word don't know: doozy
Mean Things: Jean just saw the black helicopters
Books in progress: Martin Cruz Smith, Stallion Gate; Jay Lake, The Trial of Flowers
Other writing-related work: slushed, critted a chapter
Interesting tidbits: The Bride of Absolute Write: the reconstruction is under way.
The glamour!:Cut a bit of protein and some keratin off my left index finger while chopping lemon balm. Fortunately, I was using a just-honed Henckels knife, so it doesn't hurt a bit, but it was pretty gruesome for a few moments there.
- Mood:
hopeful - Music:Wicked Tinkers - Seal Set / Susannah Keith - House of the Ri
--
I have reached yet another impasse, as the Tindalosi story continues to taunt me. Specifically, I know what the kicker line for this story is. And I have the first ten and a half pages written, which is the setup. What I am missing is the climax and the resolution, both thematic and narrative. I know what the narrative climax has to be, but I do not yet have its why or how or wherefore. And the thematic climax is a great big sucking hole in the sky.
What this means, essentially, is that I am stuck wandering around poking things with sharp objects until the story hands itself over to me.
Foolish story.
I need a catalyst and an epiphany. And maybe a catfight.
A catfight would be handy.
Well, I can think about it on the train tomorrow. The train to Stratford-Upon-Avon. Pray for me; if I kill a tourbot with my bare teeth, I think they might expel me.
***
- Mood:
cranky
And some gloriously erroneous conclusions are going to be drawn.
Book 27: Ul de Rico, The White Goblin. Yeah, it's a kid's book, but I figure I can add it into the portion-of-Cook to claim it as a complete entry.
Alas, this slender volume does not measure up to The Rainbow Goblins, of which I have a battered and much-reread copy that was originally given to me by my Aunt Lissa (the name Elizabeth runs in some families; in mine, it gallops) either in terms of art or storyline. And I don't think that's just sentiment talking.
Book 28: David Riggs, Ben Jonson: A Life.
Once he hit Prince Henry and The Alchemist, I was in paydirt. Yay!
Man, there is a lot of book in this book.
"My own plans are made. While I can, I sail east in the Dawn Treader. When she fails me, I paddle east in my coracle. When she sinks, I shall swim east with my four paws. And when I can swim no longer, if I have not reached Aslan's country, or shot over the edge of the world in some vast cataract, I shall sink with my nose to the sunrise...."
--Reepicheep
- Mood:
will that bread never cook?
--Marlene Dietrich
***
In the continuing tradition of any work but the work we should be doing, I have page proofs due March 7th, and I have instead the first line of a new (old? It'd be set about twenty and ten years before Hammered, on dual time lines) Jenny story, tentatively titled "War Stories." And I have the first paragraph and the last paragraph of Posthumous Jonson.
No progress, of course, on Undertow. Or any of the other short stories I have started but haven't made any traction on since I posted the list of first lines.
My brain is punishing me for last year; I'm certain of it.
The good news is. I have my living room and kitchen mostly set up, and it looks pretty good (seven trips to the dumpster yesterday.) I have to buy new carriage bolts for the futon; these are a bit stripped.
I guess I should try getting this book case built so I can unpack some more boxes, shouldn't I? (yes, you may be amused by the fact that the absolute last thing to be unpacked is the clothes.)
- Mood:
chipper - Music:Mark Knopfler - Devil Baby
(One thing I think is really cool about livejournal is that it opens up these sorts of industry discussions to people who are serving their apprenticeship, and I suspect both new writers and older ones benefit from that transparency. There is no great publishing conspiracy; just a lot of people doing their jobs and talking shop with their friends.)
I'm reading (re-reading, really, but it's been fifteen years or so--remember that terrible Anthropology and Science Fiction class,
"The novelist says in words what cannot be said in words."
--Ursula K. LeGuin, introduction to The Left Hand of Darkness
Yeah. What she said. That's it exactly; that's why novelists have to work by indirection and illusion, why we have to work in the understory and the subtext as well as the text. Work by example and show-don't-tell. We have to demonstrate because--if we have any ambition at all--what we need to say isn't easy to say. The language is not adequate to the concepts.
Theme is a nebulous thing. It can be illuminated. The attention can be directed toward it. But one can only ever glimpse it from the corner of one's eye; when one tries to get it squarely in view, it vanishes like a stalked deer. Theme is truculent and wary, and if you try to come at it square the best you can hope for is pedantry.
Which is why the business of the novelist is to raise questions, not offer answers. We irritate, and the reader grows the pearl.
The story is too big to fit in the words.
I have a complex response to reading, say, Delany, Link, Lafferty. I adore what they do. But it's often so inimical to my own skills and my sense of the way fiction works that I find myself in the corner, blinking and shaking my head and trying to understand where the punch that just sprawled me on the mat might have come from.
It works, this stuff. I can't deny that it works. I can even see how it works, sometimes--or at least how pieces of it work, even if I can't quite feel the outline of the whole. I know it works because my own sense of thematic completion tells me it works--and that the scope and the arc and the closure and the catharsis and the denouement of the story are thematic, not narrative) but actually getting my own stories to work that way...
...it doesn't happen. I'm not a linear writer (I'm inductive rather than deductive, and in addition to not being able to structure like Kelly Link, I couldn't structure like Connie Willis if you offered me a five-book contract and a creme-filled doughnut) but I am a narrative one. My themes tuck in under the narrative. My arguments occur in the background. It's perfectly possible to read one of my books and never see the argument happening at all.
I wish I could do that--that art, of getting the theme to sort of loft itself up there, airy and bright, without the superstructure of a narrative to support it... it's like suspension bridges built of spiderwebs. That you can drive a truck over. Man, that shit is schweet.
It's even more interesting to me as a writer because for me, thematic resolution is more important than narrative resolution... but I can't walk away from a story with the narrative unresolved. I can swing a lady and the tiger ending--but that's a hard narrative hang, and intentional one, like the gorgeous and glorious end of Roger Zelazny's Jack of Shadows-- that last sentence, and the interrupted plunge. Finish it yourself.
You go ahead and tell me how it ends.
That I can do. But that's a resolution. But I couldn't end a story the way
My brain doesn't work that way.
OTOH, I thought Hammered had an ending--enough to justify the break in the narrative, anyway--and I seem to run about 50/50 with readers on that. But the people who hated it wanted to pull out my toenails for it. Which, I guess, in some respect is good. Signifies reader involvement. We like that.
I do have some preferences--I prefer open-ended books to really tidy ones. I like the sense that the world goes on. I love the hint of the new story, the next story beginning. The sensation of a pause between heartbeats. But that's all narrative stuff.
But these other things--the stories that hang on their theme--just drift on air, glistening, and all that holds them up is bootstrap levitation. They happen in the interstices. Around the edges of the narrative.
They happen in spite of the narrative.
Bad litfic is the result, I think, of auctorial misunderstanding (or inability) to create this kind of spiderweb engineering that is a quality of a certain type of good literary fiction. (litfic, in the current discussion, equals genre mainstream lit; literary fiction = literature. terms defined; carry on) To wit, that a story doesn't need a concrete narrative or a traditional arc to be effective if the thematic resolution is sufficiently telling. (See: Adaptation, "Magic for Beginners," "The Ones Who Walk Away From Omelas.")
When it works, you feel it like a bell tolling in your chest.
When it doesn't, you roll your eyes and promise yourself that you're not reading college lit magazines any more. Because if that thematic arc falters, and there's no narrative holding it up, all you have left are a bunch of pretty words.
I'm aware, painfully, of my own limits as a writer. I'm capable of strong narrative and characterization to drive a story, and I'm getting better at threading a fairly complex thematic dialogue through that narrative. I can write a pretty sentence when the spirit moves me, and a plain one when the narrative demands. I can hook paragraphs together. I think, in my less humble moments, that I've earned my journeyman's boots at this writing gig and I may even be getting pretty good at it.
But man, I look with awe upon the Laffertys of the world. That stuff is extreme.
Which is why it's a little disingenuous of me to say that I want to be good at everything. Because I do--I want to master thematic and narrative arc. I want to plot and characterize. I want literary sensibility and fantastic writing and I want accessibility too.
But treading that middle ground is actually playing to my strengths. I'm too much a fence-straddler to commit to any of the extremes.
ETA: Matthew Cheney talked about just this thing with regard to Mieville last year.
"I forgot what a king is, forgot that the king in his own eyes is Karhide, forgot what patriotism is and that he is, of necessity, the perfect patriot."
--Ursula K. LeGuin, The Left Hand of Darkness
.
- Mood:
analytical - Music:Joan Baez - The Night They Drove Old Dixie Down
--George Bernard Shaw, Caesar and Cleopatra
(thanks to
I've often said that one of the most useful accidents of training for me as a writer has been a thorough grounding in social anthropology, because it alienates the hell out of you. Seriously, a good bit of an undergrad anthropology program is designed to make you look at your own tribal customs as the bizarre set of beliefs they are.
Once you understand acculturation, you're doomed to spend the rest of your life second-guessing your assumptions. This is a really useful tool for a science fiction or fantasy writer.
Unfortunately, it also makes it really difficult to take better-acculturated people seriously. But since it usually takes two or three years of undergrad training to alienate somebody sufficiently to turn them into an anthropologist, there's not much you can do about it under field conditions.
...of course, the crowning irony here is that the process of breaking somebody's acculturation in order to alienate them from their society is a process of acculturation, too. And the person you wind up with when you're done with them is painfully self conscious, more or less not fit for polite society any more, and probably also a little bit creepy.
- Mood:
creative