There
Reason for stopping: Finally kicked the butt of that damned sex scene. Why is healthy sex so much harder to write than deeply emotionally traumatic sex?
In other news, I feel *much* better than I did this afternoon, and the boy is getting pizza. Yay boy! Yay pizza!
Also, my hands hurt less. And The Fall of the Kings is really, really, really good.
On the emotionally traumatic sex...erm *has no comment*
And FotK is indeedy, very good.
Have you seen that interesting masculine/feminine writing analyser thingy, btw? I think it was mentioned on Neil Gaiman's blog.
I didn't see it in Gaiman's blog, but I did in Jed Hartman's.
You have no idea how glad I am to hear that...
I think that's a chocolatey RAM-chip moment: I mean, good news isn't news, unless it's unusual.
It's a good button to have. *g*
Good points all
Peer pressure is very real and there were girls in my school who had sex merely so that they wouldn't teased for being virgins. Very bad reason, in my book.
Of course, mine own Redfern came up with a suggestion that I personally don't tend to write healthy sex scenes because I don't usually write for titillation, and that's all they would be.
::All characters glare and chorus Sadist::
Re: Good points all
Re: Good points all
::wails::
They always end up far too angsty.
Re: Good points all
Re: Good points all
How do you stand on the debauching of cathedrals?
::It has ridiculous rooftiles. Besides, it wasn't as if God was *there*::
How do you stand on the debauching of cathedrals?
And God is everywhere. Unless Kit is right, and he's nowhere, and everywhere is Hell.
Re: How do you stand on the debauching of cathedrals?
Please give generously on your way out.
::Marlowe had no conception of what hell truly is::
Ignore him. He's bitter.
Re: How do you stand on the debauching of cathedrals?
Re: How do you stand on the debauching of cathedrals?
Unfortunately the boys take advantage of the fact that I love them.
*Never* fall for a character. It rarely works out, as any of the VC can vouch for.